42 Answers

0 like 0 dislike
ago by Newbie (360 points)
The study and the species are both real. The study and the species are both real. Researchers did observe and document Octopus tetricus throwing shells, silt, and algae at Jervis Bay in Australia, and it was published in PLOS ONE in 2022, so the core of the claim holds up. But the way it spread online is a pretty good example of how a nuanced study gets flattened into a much simpler story. The lead researcher Peter Godfrey-Smith actually said that most of the throws look more like den cleanup than targeted attacks. In one of the key observations a female threw material 17 times, and out of those 17 throws, eight hit another female and only one hit a male. That is not exactly the rock-throwing feminist icon narrative that went viral. The scientists themselves were pretty careful about it too, saying it is really hard to infer the motivation of animals and that not every throw that hit a neighbor was necessarily aimed at one. Some of it could have been accidental. The behavior is real and it is genuinely interesting, but the specific version where females are defending themselves from harassing males is mostly the internet doing what it always does, which is taking the most dramatic possible reading of a complicated study and running with it. The claim is partly true. The framing around it is where things get stretched.
Exaggerated/ Misleading
0 like 0 dislike
ago by Newbie (260 points)

Think of this as your investigation log. Answer each question to explain what you discovered and how you got there.

1. Write a brief overall summary of your findings.

Although this claim is not untrue, the term “better” is ver relative and misleading in this context. The article that is provided as a source throughly goes into the benefits, both calorically and otherwise of both types of meat. Depending on what a person may be looking for in their diet, each meat may provide different, valuable benefits. White meat is typically considered a “lean meat” that provides more protein and less fat. Dark meat contains more nutriance that may help with a person’s immune system, energy stability, and even muscle recovery. I was able to find sources that supported the benefits of both kinds of meats, https://sunshinecoastorganicmeats.com.au/blogs/cool-stuff/white-meat?srsltid=AfmBOoq1bGN0RvryCss95RqgThvJEbxrODJWQRugFQSs0udfCyMAEj7G and https://themakersmeadow.com/blog/why-chicken-thighs-are-the-best-and-most-nutritious-cut-of-the-bird. Possible bais here could be people with different health needs writing these articles. Someone who is lacking in protein intake and hoping to lose weight or gain muscle may see white meat as the “better” meat option. However someone who is lacking nutrients may see dark meat as a better meat source. Overall, your claim is not incorrect, but it is more of an opinions based claim rather than a fact and in the future should be presented that way. 

Can't be true or false (Opinion, poem, etc.)

Community Rules


• Be respectful
• Always list your sources and include links so readers can check them for themselves.
• Use primary sources when you can, and only go to credible secondary sources if necessary.
• Try to rely on more than one source, especially for big claims.
• Point out if sources you quote have interests that could affect how accurate their evidence is.
• Watch for bias in sources and let readers know if you find anything that might influence their perspective.
• Show all the important evidence, whether it supports or goes against the claim.
...