1 like 0 dislike

2 Answers

0 like 0 dislike
by Novice (570 points)
Test answer for demo
Can't be true or false (Opinion, poem, etc.)
0 like 0 dislike
ago by Newbie (220 points)

I think your claim is strong, but it mixes facts with opinion. For example, there’s solid evidence from groups like the UN and IPCC that climate change is serious and urgent, and that acting quickly can reduce damage. But phrases like “global emergency” and “unite for our planet” are more persuasive than factual. For instance, organizations like the United Nations Environment Programme state that “the world is in a state of climate emergency,” and warn that climate change is already causing extreme weather events like heatwaves, floods, and wildfires. You could improve your argument by separating what is scientifically supported from what is more opinion-based language. 

Can't be true or false (Opinion, poem, etc.)
ago by (140 points)
0 0
While you do cite organizations like the UN and IPCC, you do not directly explain why these sources were chosen nor explain why these directly support your response to this claim. Your response also feels emotionally charged which makes it hard to differentiate between the evidence and opinion begins and ends, can you more clearly clarify which of these claims are scientific?

Community Rules


• Be respectful
• Always list your sources and include links so readers can check them for themselves.
• Use primary sources when you can, and only go to credible secondary sources if necessary.
• Try to rely on more than one source, especially for big claims.
• Point out if sources you quote have interests that could affect how accurate their evidence is.
• Watch for bias in sources and let readers know if you find anything that might influence their perspective.
• Show all the important evidence, whether it supports or goes against the claim.
...