The link from this claim post doesn’t back up the argument. Quoted directly from this website: “Biotechnology critics maintain that food insecurity is mostly a political and economic crisis. ‘Hunger is the result of distribution and infrastructure problems, and it won’t be eliminated by growing . GMOs,’”. The idea that GMOs are the only solution to world hunger is incorrect and designed to paint GMOs in a good light while dismissing any plan of restructuring the system of capitalism and how wealth and food is hoarded. The Canadian Biotechnology Action Network states “People are generally hungry not because of insufficient agricultural production, but because they do not have money to buy food, access to land to grow food, or because of complex problems like food spoilage, poor food distribution systems and a lack of reliable water and infrastructure for irrigation, storage, transport and financing”. This rhetoric that GMOs will save us, also stems from the green revolution, when corn, wheat and rice crops were modified to have higher yields. The international food policy research institute says “Overall, the Green Revolution was a major achievement for many developing countries and gave them an unprecedented level of national food security…At the same time, the Green Revolution had many negative environmental impacts that have still to be adequately redressed.”
https://geneticliteracyproject.org/gmo-faq/are-gmos-necessary-to-feed-the-world/#:~:text=No%20scientist%20claims%20that%20GMOs,are%20one%20tool%20among%20many.
https://cban.ca/wp-content/uploads/do-we-need-gm-feed-world-report-E-web.pdfhttps://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/15888/files/mi02gr01.pdf