0 like 1 dislike
ago by Master (5.5k points)
closed ago by
And it helped that your God and Savior Dr Fauci did lie about it, did hide the fact that they funded the research, did say that if a leak happened it would be acceptable because the  science was worthwhile, erase emails, used illegal forms of communication to hide what they had done...
closed

1 Answer

0 like 0 dislike
ago by Innovator (54.3k points)
 
Best answer
Fasle. It is worth noting that part of the claim is grounded in real investigations, especially around the NIH funding and internal communications practices. However, there's no evidence to support that the leak would be acceptable or that Fauci engaged in illegal activity. According to reason.com, Fauci gave misleading and evasive answers, but it does not prove illegal activity or an "acceptable leak" situation.

https://www.factcheck.org/2021/05/the-wuhan-lab-and-the-gain-of-function-disagreement/

https://fedscoop.com/nih-email-scandal-shocking-disregard-public-record-keeping-or-within-federal-rules/

https://reason.com/2024/06/04/anthony-fauci-gives-misleading-evasive-answers-about-nih-funded-research-at-wuhan-lab/
False

Community Rules


• Be respectful
• Always list your sources and include links so readers can check them for themselves.
• Use primary sources when you can, and only go to credible secondary sources if necessary.
• Try to rely on more than one source, especially for big claims.
• Point out if sources you quote have interests that could affect how accurate their evidence is.
• Watch for bias in sources and let readers know if you find anything that might influence their perspective.
• Show all the important evidence, whether it supports or goes against the claim.
...