4 like 3 dislike
by Journeyman (3.1k points)
There's no proof that vaccines have not caused autism. The most plausible cause, however, is a combination of many things, including certain ingredients in vaccines
by Newbie (220 points)
0 0
there has been very extensive research over the past two decades into seeing if there has been any correlation between the two, and it has been found that there has not. Many doctors have been found to say that there can be a correlation between the age of autism diagnosis and the vaccine schedule. this same website also touched on the fact that it has been found that your chance of having autism is 60-90% based on your genome.

https://www.autismspeaks.org/what-causes-autism

9 Answers

4 like 0 dislike
by Apprentice (1.1k points)
selected by
 
Best answer

The claim that vaccines cause autism is a widely debunked myth. Extensive research has consistently shown no credible link between vaccines and autism. Autism is influenced by a complex mix of genetic and environmental factors, as highlighted by organizations like Autism Speaks and research from the National Institutes of Health (NIH). The anti-vaccine movement has played a significant role in perpetuating this false belief. A major contributor to this myth was a 1998 study by Andrew Wakefield, a former English doctor published in The Lancet, which hypothesized that the MMR vaccine caused autism. However, the study had critical flaws. Since most children in England received the MMR vaccine, it was expected that many diagnosed with autism had also been vaccinated, making this correlation unsurprising. In addition, the study was later retracted due to scientific misconduct, as it misrepresented data and was deemed fraudulent. Despite its retraction, Wakefield's paper fueled misinformation, and its claims continue to influence public opinion. 

https://www.autismspeaks.org/what-causes-autism

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5789217/

https://www.chop.edu/vaccine-education-center/vaccine-safety/vaccines-and-other-conditions/autism

False
by Newbie (270 points)
0 0
This response is very well thought out and you can tell, this user took their time and did a large amount of research, not only to just fact check this claim but to also find the evidence and explain how this is not true. This is seems like a very professional response and I am glad I can look at these trusted sources and believe your claim.
by Novice (770 points)
1 0
This fact check is very well done and well researched. I really appreciated how you not only debunked the original claim but also provided evidence to show how this widespread myth was created and perpetuated. Additionally, I appreciated how you provided links to government sources in order to corroborate your claims.
by Newbie (220 points)
0 0
the fact check was very thorough and well thought through. it was great work to be able to debunk the original claim and prove what was wrong about it and how it was even able to spread and be made in the first place.
by Novice (690 points)
0 0
This fact check covers all the bases when checking if a claim is correct or not. The evidence is also from trusted sources, including Autism Speaks, the non-profit organization. Overall, this fact is nicely done.
by Novice (570 points)
0 0
I enjoyed this factcheck, not only did it address the topic at hand but also delving into the origination of the myth was helpful. The sources used to support are also very reliable sources not looking to simply grab your interest but to really inform. Throughly well done.
by Newbie (300 points)
0 0
This is a great fact check. Not only did you prove the claim false you also found the very origin of the myth and tackled it from the start of the rumor. I also enjoy how you supported the claim with multiple links.
by Newbie (230 points)
0 0
This factcheck is really well done and clearly well-researched. I really liked how you not only debunked the original claim but also explained how this myth spread and gained traction. I also appreciated that you included links to government sources to back up your points it made your argument even stronger. Great job!
by Newbie (290 points)
0 0
Your fact-check is really well done, especially the part about Wakefield’s study being discredited due to ethical issues and fraud. It’s crazy how much influence that one study had, even after it was proven wrong. I also like that you included studies from the CDC and WHO—those really help back up your argument and give it a solid foundation.
by Innovator (51.8k points)
0 0
Thanks for providing context on where the conspiracy began.
by Newbie (470 points)
0 0
This factcheck is done very well and you can tell the user did a good amount of research to debunk this myth. Thank you for providing even more information on why this isn't true
by Newbie (350 points)
0 0
This response did a great job outlining the origins of this myth and why it has been debunked. One thing that could strengthen your argument is mentioning large-scale studies specifically disproving Wakefirled's claims. Citing concrete dates like that might help counter the emotional appeal that misinformation often relies on.
by Newbie (460 points)
0 0
I fully agree with this fact-check. I appreciate the mention of the history of this claim being a fraudulent study that was misinterpreted. I also liked the inclusion of the NIH article as the NIH is a very reliable source. This is a very important issue to clear up misinformation of as vaccines are NOT the cause of autism, and that theory has lead to, rom my observation, the furthering of ablism and the spreading of disease.
by Novice (560 points)
0 0
I agree with the fact check. it did a great job showing the original proof of when the claims started and why they weren't true. there is many claims it why its a myth and I liked the articles you chose.
ago by Newbie (280 points)
0 0
This is a very knowledgeable fact check that I agree with. I like that you cited .org and .gov websites because those tend to be factual websites to use to back up fact checks. Overall, this is a good fact check and you did a great job at providing proof for your facts.
2 like 0 dislike
by Novice (530 points)

After doing some research into the claim that "there's no proof that vaccines have not caused autism," it's clear that this statement is false. This misconception started from a 1998 study by Andrew Wakefield, which falsely linked the MMR (measles, mumps, and rubella) vaccine to autism. The study was later stopped due to ethical violations and flaws in views, and Wakefield lost his medical license. More large scale studies have found no evidence supporting a link between vaccines and autism. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) states that vaccines do not cause autism. Similarly, the World Health Organization (WHO) has debunked the alleged connection between vaccines and autism. So, the accusation lacks scientific validity and has been proven to be not true.

https://www.who.int/groups/global-advisory-committee-on-vaccine-safety/topics/mmr-vaccines-and-autism

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3136032/

False
by Newbie (450 points)
0 0
Great response, your sources are credible and provide clear information supporting your fact check which you cited in your response. I found your response helpful to better understand the lack of validity in the original claim.
by Newbie (290 points)
0 0
This is a very informative response. I liked the elaboration on Wakefield and what happened after the accusation that the vaccine was linked to autism. I also appreciate the info provided on what reputable organizations like the CDC and WHO have done to investigate further.
0 like 0 dislike
by Newbie (420 points)

The claim stated above has been proved false by endless articles. Many fact checks have been placed on studies and articles that support the idea that vaccines cause autism. The article, "Link between autism and vaccinations debunked" talks about how a study done in 1988 brought about this ideology placing a narrative that lacks evidence into peoples heads claiming there was a direct correlation between vaccines and autism. Autism is a condition which is related to the development of a child's brain, limiting the ability for certain behaviors and pathways to form. In the article, "Vaccines and Autism" it touches more on the study shared in 1988 by Andrew Wakefield's study published called "The Lancet" this article really tears back the layers on why his claim on the correlation between vaccines and autism is false, sharing that he did not perform tests before and after the vaccines, only after. The article, “A timeline of the Wakefield Retraction” says, “6 March 2004 Ten authors on the 1998 paper issue a retraction, and The Lancet's editor says the journal, in hindsight, should not have published the study.” Many people still believe that this claim is true even with all the information going against this claim. Another article that shows a study that proves the claim that vaccines do not cause autism is, “Autism and Vaccines” and it states, “ Researchers have also studied thimerosal, a mercury-based preservative used in many vaccines, to see if it had any relation to autism. The results are clear: The data show no relationship between vaccines, thimerosal and autism.” 

https://www.chop.edu/vaccine-education-center/vaccine-safety/vaccines-and-other-conditions/autism

https://www.mayoclinichealthsystem.org/hometown-health/speaking-of-health/autism-vaccine-link-debunked

https://www.nature.com/articles/nm0310-248b 

https://autismsciencefoundation.org/autism-and-vaccines/#:~:text=Vaccines%20Do%20Not%20Cause%20Autism&text=Researchers%20have%20also%20studied%20thimerosal,between%20vaccines%2C%20thimerosal%20and%20autism

False
1 like 0 dislike
by Newbie (320 points)
There has been substantial research debunking the theory that vaccines cause autism. Research has consistently shown that autism occurs due to genetic and environmental factors. The argument that vaccines cause autism is a scapegoat for upset parents who blame the occurrence on external factors to self-comfort. The developmental condition usually becomes prevalent between 12 and 18 months, and children usually receive vaccinations as early as a few weeks old. It makes sense why people make the connection or argument, mainly because it's easier to take in rather than just coincidence or bad luck. There was a false link between MMR vaccines and autism due to the age of it being administered and the early onset of autism symptoms, which was the most significant cause of the uproar.

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5789217/

https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/hcp/imz-schedules/child-adolescent-age.html

https://www.autismspeaks.org/what-causes-autism
False
0 like 0 dislike
by Novice (610 points)

A BlueSky account is not a reputable source to get information from. Id recommend searching for studies on the subject, as plenty can be found through the NIH page. According to the studies that were done, "Twenty epidemiologic studies have shown that neither thimerosal nor MMR vaccine causes autism. These studies have been performed in several countries by many different investigators who have employed a multitude of epidemiologic and statistical methods. The large size of the studied populations has afforded a level of statistical power sufficient to detect even rare associations.". In short, there is no link between the vaccines and autism. If you do want to learn more about this here is the source that I used, and on it are links to the studies that were done.

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2908388/#S9

False
0 like 0 dislike
by Newbie (370 points)
Extensive research done by the National Institute of Health and the organization Autism Speaks has debunked this, proving that autism is caused by a mix of genetic and environmental factors. Additionally, the study that suggested a correlation between children who received the MMR vaccine and children with autism was retracted due to scientific misconduct.
False
0 like 0 dislike
by Newbie (300 points)
The claim that vaccines cause Autism is a false claim. The claim uses a bluesky post as evidence however it is not a credible source, along with that fact there is no connection between vaccines and autism. A post by CDC (Center of Disease Control and Prevention) debunks the conspiracy by stating "Studies have shown that there is no link between recieving vaccines and developing autism. No links have been found between any vaccine ingredients and ASD (Autism Spectrum Disorder)" The article contiues going to the fact that parents may be worried about the effects vaccines have on their children, however The National Academy of Medicine reviewed the safety of multiple vaccines and found that vaccines are safe to take. The article goes further to mention the CDC's own study in 2013 which showed the same results.

Post:
https://www.cdc.gov/vaccine-safety/about/autism.html
False
0 like 0 dislike
by Newbie (300 points)

Vaccines do not cause autism. Extensive research, including large-scale studies from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the World Health Organization (WHO), has found no link between vaccines and autism. The claim originated from a 1998 study by Andrew Wakefield, which was later debunked and retracted due to fraudulent data. Since then, multiple studies have confirmed that vaccines are safe and do not increase autism risk. Spreading this misinformation can lead to vaccine hesitancy, putting public health at risk.

Source: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) – Vaccines and Autism

False
0 like 0 dislike
by Newbie (300 points)
The narrative that vaccines cause autism is an old and untrue one. Many studies have proven that there is no correlation between the two. The original study that claimed to find an association between autism and vaccines was discredited. It is crucial to double-check where you get information from because anybody can post and say that vaccines cause autism without proper evidence.

Sources:
https://health.clevelandclinic.org/do-vaccines-cause-autism

https://www.cdc.gov/vaccine-safety/about/autism.html
False

Community Rules


• Be respectful
• Always list your sources and include links so readers can check them for themselves.
• Use primary sources when you can, and only go to credible secondary sources if necessary.
• Try to rely on more than one source, especially for big claims.
• Point out if sources you quote have interests that could affect how accurate their evidence is.
• Watch for bias in sources and let readers know if you find anything that might influence their perspective.
• Show all the important evidence, whether it supports or goes against the claim.
...