1 like 4 dislike
by Journeyman (3.8k points)
edited by
Without people there would be no forest fires in California right now because dry vegetation CANNOT ignite, unlike what the media is telling us.

--

Das ewige Geheimnis in dummdeutschen Schwurbelmedien, wie trockene Vegetation "sich entzünden" kann.

Sie tut es nie. Jemand muss sie anzünden. Es gäbe ohne Menschen zur Zeit keinen Waldbrand in Kalifornien.

Desinformation hilft nie, nicht mal einer guten Sache.
ago by Newbie (290 points)
0 0
Your claim is False.

Dry vegetation does not catch fire on its own; it needs an ignition source. While humans cause many wildfires through campfires, cigarettes, and power lines, natural causes like lightning strikes can also start fires. In California, hot, dry, and windy conditions make it easier for fires to spread once ignited. Though human activity increases wildfire frequency, fires can still happen naturally. Lightning storms, rare volcanic activity, and even rockfalls creating sparks have started fires before. So while people play a big role in wildfires, it’s not true that fires wouldn’t happen without them—natural wildfires have existed for millions of years.

https://www.preventionweb.net/news/lightning-caused-wildfires-are-80-percent-more-likely-under-dry-vegetation

6 Answers

0 like 0 dislike
ago by Novice (740 points)
selected ago by
 
Best answer

This claim comes from an unverified Bluesky post, making it unreliable. According to National Geographic, wildfires can start naturally due to factors like lightning, strong winds, droughts, and high temperatures. While CNN reports that 95% of wildfires in California are caused by people, it's not just human activity that makes them so destructive. The real issue is that small, natural fires which would typically clear out dry vegetation are often suppressed. This leads to a buildup of debris, creating the perfect fuel for massive, uncontrollable wildfires when they do ignite. The claim that "without people, there would be no forest fires in California right now because dry vegetation CANNOT ignite, unlike what the media is telling us" is false. Wildfires have always been a natural occurrence, but human interference has made them far more intense and widespread.

Source

https://education.nationalgeographic.org/resource/wildfires-how-they-form-and-why-theyre-so-dangerous/

False
ago by Newbie (490 points)
0 0
This is a great breakdown of the issue! It does a great job of clarifying that while wildfires can start naturally, human activity has made them way more intense. I like how you pointed out that suppressing small fires actually makes things worse by letting dry vegetation build up. The National Geographic source was a great source to use to help back up the argument!
2 like 0 dislike
ago by Apprentice (1.1k points)

Your claim that there would be no wildfires in California without people is also challenged by a variety of factors outlined in reliable sources. According to experts, wildfire can start from natural causes, such as lightning, alongside human-induced causes like discarded cigarette butts or power line malfunctions (Doan & Delzer, 2025). Furthermore, the vegetation, exacerbated by climate change, will also be capable of igniting fires with the occurrence of unusual weather patterns, such as the Santa Ana winds (Stephens & Kruczkiewicz, 2025). The fires are a result of global warming, and the human contribution lies in the frequency and magnitude of occurrences rather than being the primary cause.

https://www.climatecentre.org/15016/the-climate-science-behind-the-california-wildfires/

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/wildfire-conspiracy-theories-viral-fact-check/

Exaggerated/ Misleading
0 like 0 dislike
ago by Newbie (320 points)
While human activity, such as arson and poor land management, contributes to some wildfires, natural causes like lightening can also ignite fires. Wildfires have been occurring for thousands of years, even before human intervention.
Exaggerated/ Misleading
ago by Apprentice (1.6k points)
0 0
Although your comment makes sense, it doesn't have any proof or sources to back this up. If you can provide evidence to back this up then I think that your answer could be better.
ago by Newbie (430 points)
0 0
This answer seems to be very true! Something I would advise would be to add a source to ensure your claim. The claim that without people we wouldn't have California fires is true, although the fires are not caused by people alone and have many natural reactions.
ago by Novice (540 points)
0 0
This claim seems to be true, however, has no cited evidence to strengthen the argument and back up your point. I suggest looking up statistics on human activity and wildfires, or other articles that may help push your point.
1 like 0 dislike
ago by Newbie (400 points)

This claim is false, as wildfires can start from other factors other than solely from human behavior. Yet, this claim is close to being true, as a 2023 Article titled, Wildfires: How They Form, and Why They're so Dangerous, by The National Geographic Society, claims, “Authorities have pointed to the fact that 95 percent of fires in the state of California are started by people, according to CNN” (National Geographic, 1). This article proves how the majority of wildfires are caused by humans, but with further information in the article, we learn that there are some other possible factors. The same article states, “Another possible cause of forest fires is lightning. Scientists have found that every degree of global warming sets off a 12 percent bump in lightning activity. Since 1975 the number of fires ignited by lightning has increased between two and five percent.” This shows how climate change and weather patterns are also a possible cause. This last quotation also proves that the climate can be ignited and set on fire. Therefore the claim cannot be true. 


National Geographic Society. Wildfires: How They Form and Why They're So Dangerous. National Geographic, 5 Mar. 2025, https://education.nationalgeographic.org/resource/wildfires-how-they-form-and-why-theyre-so-dangerous/.

False
1 like 0 dislike
ago by Novice (760 points)

This claim is false; wildfires can start from natural causes such as lightning, volcanic activity, and sparks from falling rocks. Even without humans in California, there would still be the possibility of wildfires occurring because of natural causes, so this claim is fake. I got my resources from https://www.coastal.ca.gov/fire/ucsbfire.html

False
ago by Newbie (290 points)
0 0
I agree, many fires can be started for many various reasons hence categorizing forest fires as natural disasters. Great point! Very similar to my point as well
0 like 0 dislike
ago by Newbie (490 points)

This claim comes from a Bluesky post from an unverified source making it unreliable. According to National Geographic, wildfires can occur due to various natural causes such as lighting, strong wind, droughts, and high temperatures. While the article states, "95% of fires in the state of California are started by people, according to CNN." They focus on how the combination of natural factors combined by human influence and disturbance in the ecosystem cause large powerful fires as small less strong fires are put out early on preventing natural wildfires from running their course early on. Since these little fires are being put out or prevented the build up of natural debris allows for wildfires to become widespread and dangerous. The claim, "Without people there would be no forest fires in California right now because dry vegetation CANNOT ignite, unlike what the media is telling us." is false as wildfires do occur naturally but because of human interference they have decimated areas of California and grown far too widespread.

Wildfires: How They Form, and Why They're so Dangerous

False

Community Rules


• Be respectful
• Always list your sources and include links so readers can check them for themselves.
• Use primary sources when you can, and only go to credible secondary sources if necessary.
• Try to rely on more than one source, especially for big claims.
• Point out if sources you quote have interests that could affect how accurate their evidence is.
• Watch for bias in sources and let readers know if you find anything that might influence their perspective.
• Show all the important evidence, whether it supports or goes against the claim.
...