0 like 2 dislike
by Journeyman (3.1k points)
edited by
Bill Clinton was officially named as Epstein's "most prolific pedophile" in leaked court documents.

2 Answers

0 like 0 dislike
by Novice (710 points)
selected ago by
 
Best answer

The post in the claim is not from a news source and has no claim for trustworthiness. Within the past couple of weeks, Bill Clinton as well as other politicians and celebrities have been named in court documents associated with Epstein. An article form the NPR describes how Virginia Guiffre testified in court and claimed that Clinton was aware of Epstein’s prostitution ring and pedophilic behavior. Clinton has also been proven to have had interactions with some of Epstein’s victims. Clinton is mentioned throughout the court documents, previously as one of the “John Does”. The name releases for the various “John Does” in the documents happened just last month, but so far there has been nothing from the court claiming Clinton as Epstein’s “most prolific pedophile.” The claim is misleading and not factual. Clinton has been named in court documents, but so far has not been implicated in any crimes associated with Epstein.

https://www.npr.org/2024/01/13/1224147251/epstein-jeffrey-documents-ghislane-maxwell-giuffre-dershowitz-clinton-trump

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/jeffrey-epstein-list-names-b2697066.html

Exaggerated/ Misleading
by Novice (770 points)
0 0
This is a really thorough fact check and I really appreciated how you were able to find apolitical, unbiased reporting on this topic regardless of the fact that it coould become a political conversation. Additionally, I really appreciated your use of verbiage straight from the source.
0 like 0 dislike
by Apprentice (1.1k points)
Firstly, this source is nothing short of unreliable. You have linked to a bluesky post made by an account that is evidently a burner with no posted credentials to report on their claims as well as posting nothing except for inflammatory right-wing content. Secondly, I believe the screenshot in this post is doctored. Upon searching for this article by both its title and through reverse image searching, no article that matched this headline nor author were found, and the source of this article is posted nowhere in the screenshot making the claim and there is no link provided in or below the post.

While Bill Clinton's name was previously mentioned in court documents regarding Epstein's case, they have since been discredited. According to ABC, Sarah Ransome, the young woman who claimed she had tapes of Bill Clinton on Epstein's island, admitted that she had fabricated such a claim in order to garner attention on Epstein's case. This does not fully disprove any involvement with Clinton, however this has not been proven.

https://abcnews.go.com/US/new-round-jeffrey-epstein-court-documents-unsealed/story?id=106174129
Exaggerated/ Misleading
ago by Novice (840 points)
0 0
You did a really good job in your fact check by going deep into every aspect of this claim and searching for the truth. I can tell you took a lot of time to go into the initial claim and find its origins, then went beyond that to find more sources confirming your findings. Your last paragraph is strong, too, clarifying that while the main part of the claim is false, there are still things that are still unproven.
ago by Newbie (240 points)
0 0
I really liked how you immediately went in and explained how this claim was seemingly not true. You then clear up on your clean by stating facts and clearing up what actually happened!

Community Rules


• Be respectful
• Always list your sources and include links so readers can check them for themselves.
• Use primary sources when you can, and only go to credible secondary sources if necessary.
• Try to rely on more than one source, especially for big claims.
• Point out if sources you quote have interests that could affect how accurate their evidence is.
• Watch for bias in sources and let readers know if you find anything that might influence their perspective.
• Show all the important evidence, whether it supports or goes against the claim.
...