0 like 1 dislike
by Legend (7.3k points)
Yes that’s a panzer SS 3rd division symbol. At the beginning of the Ukraine war, the Azov battalion had 60,000 Nazis on it. Since 2014 Ukrainian Nazis constantly bombed the Donbas because the people there identified as Russian and didn’t want to join Ukraine. In effect they wanted to cleanse them.

2 Answers

0 like 0 dislike
ago by (140 points)
The assertion that the Azov Battalion employed a Panzer SS 3rd Division emblem and had 60,000 Nazis to begin with the Ukraine war is false and cannot be verified by credible sources. It is indeed true that the Azov Battalion initially consisted of members with extremist right-wing ideologies and employed symbols such as the Wolfsangel, which carries Nazi iconographic associations. But the symbol has more extensive historical use in European heraldry, and context is key. Azov has been incorporated into Ukraine's National Guard since 2014 and is now a fully integrated part of that force, no longer an extremist militia. Major mainstream media sources such as Reuters and the New York Times reported on the transition. The figure "60,000 Nazis" is an outrageous exaggeration—credible sources such as the BBC estimate Azov's membership at the low thousands at most. In addition, the accusation that Ukrainian forces have "shelled Donbas round the clock" as ethnic cleansing resonates with propaganda typically released by Russian state media and is not endorsed by human rights organizations or impartial investigation. In general, this phrase has some basis and combines it with distortion, exaggeration, and propagandistic language.
Satire
0 like 0 dislike
ago by (140 points)
edited ago by

The original user's account seems to have the sole purpose of painting all of Ukraine's military as Nazis, bringing them into to conversations that they were originally never included in, for example in a post about Elon Musk. It seems that the accounts' goal is for the US to stop sending funds to Ukraine. The users claim that there were 60,000 Nazi’s in the Azov Battalion, who had bombed people in the Donbas due to racial cleansing, is only partially true based on the information I could find. The original user never posted any evidence for their claims besides a picture of a soldier wearing a nazi panzer SS 2nd division symbol, which led to me finding separate evidence. First of all, the Azov battalion was brought under the ministry of internal affairs in 2014 as a regiment, this caused a separation with many of the group forming the National Corps to maintain their “far right work” that they were not allowed to continue under the ministry of internal affairs (CNN). While it is true that there are nazis in the Azov Battalion, there are not 60,000. According to the independent, there are 900-1000 current members of the Azov Battalion as of 2022. I was unable to find any evidence of them committing bombings, but I found another far right group (The Aidar) in 2014 had participated in “widespread abuses, including abductions, unlawful detention, ill-treatment, theft, extortion, and possible executions" according to Newsweek. In addition, the Azov were integrated into Ukraine's National Guard by 2016 and have not fully extinguished their Neo nazi beliefs according to CNN making it plausible that there is unnecessary violence occurring though there are no sources reporting it. Overall, this reads as propaganda.

Sources: Azov movement analysis: A far-right battalion has a key role in Ukraine’s resistance. Its neo-Nazi history has been exploited by Putin | CNN

Ukrainian Nationalist Volunteers Committing 'ISIS-Style' War Crimes - Newsweek

Ukraine has a Nazi problem, but Vladimir Putin's 'denazification' claim for war is a lie.

Who are Ukraine’s neo-Nazi Azov Battalion? | The Independent

Exaggerated/ Misleading

Community Rules


• Be respectful
• Always list your sources and include links so readers can check them for themselves.
• Use primary sources when you can, and only go to credible secondary sources if necessary.
• Try to rely on more than one source, especially for big claims.
• Point out if sources you quote have interests that could affect how accurate their evidence is.
• Watch for bias in sources and let readers know if you find anything that might influence their perspective.
• Show all the important evidence, whether it supports or goes against the claim.
...