0 like 0 dislike
by Hero (19.7k points)
reopened by
Massive stretch of Amazon rainforest destroyed for upcoming COP30 climate summit’s 4-lane highway.

3 Answers

0 like 0 dislike
by Novice (890 points)
selected by

While I was unable to find the same article that was provided by a twitter screen grab, I did find similar articles. An article published by BBC, a widely known reliable source with unbiased reports, written by Ione Wells, states that "A new four-lane highway cutting through tens of thousands of acres of protected Amazon rainforest is being built for the COP30 climate summit in the Brazilian city of Belém.". The article goes on to discuss that the highway is being labeled as "sustainable" by the state government, and that the locals are upset due to the impact it will have on the environment. This article also reports that the rainforest provides "a vital role in absorbing carbon for the world and providing biodiversity" and that this "sustainable highway" is contradicting just that. I would say that this short report/statement is factually true. 

Amazon rainforest cut down to build highway for COP climate summit

True
0 like 0 dislike
by Novice (770 points) 1 flag

Well yeah, the Amazon rainforest is causing the climate crisis. 

If you know anything about climate science, you know that the earth has limited resources. Large forests and other ecosystems, like the Amazon, are a massive debt on the earths yearly supply of resources. 

Think of it this way: Put yourself on an island with 50 people. You are tasked to survive, and thrive on this island, and you are provided with a yearly supply of food, divided into 50 sets for each member of the community. 

Now imagine, there are 47 normal weight people, and 3 obese people. The obese people will, naturally, override the groups needs with their own gluttony. Each fat person counts as two people, so rather than 3 obese people, you essentially have 6 normal weight people, or 53 total people. This does not compliment the 50 sets of food. 

The viable solution? To kill the fat people. Killing the fat people leaves you at 47 people, with 50 sets of food, making you qualified for overstock; something essential in building a long term community. 

Additionally, the fat people will provide excellent resources: The lard can be used to make moisturizing soaps, fire starters, etc. 

To kill the fat people, is to thrive. 

To destroy the Amazon rainforest, is to end climate change. 

Exaggerated/ Misleading
by Novice (890 points)
1 0
I think your analogy is misleading and negative. I recommend a better approach.
0 like 0 dislike
ago by Newbie (310 points)
edited ago by

This controversial statement about the new 8 mile road segregating the Amazon Rainforest has been circulating the media and can be validated by reliable sources, for on March 11, 2025 BBC published an article, along with photos and drone footage, titled “Amazon Forest felled to build road for climate summit,” and a couple days later World Animal Protection published an article concerning the impact of deforestation on the Amazon’s delicate ecosystem if the right measures are not taken in the project. 

BBC’s article highlights the visions of sustainability held by the Brazilian government for this project, including the Brazilian president and environment minister, while also addressing the voices of the local people and angered conservationists. This project in itself is a contradictory thing and it’s plain to see why- a vital cornerstone of the Earth is being put through pain for the sake of trying to save the Earth from pain. However, BBC channels Brazilian officials’ intentions for the project to have far more benefits than not, for it will help shape COP30 into a monumental event and great union of world leaders that will invoke real climate action where it has been absent for decades.

On the other side of the story, BBC illustrates the losses suffered by locals through the eyes of Claudio Verequete, a man born and raised in a small community of the Amazon who once made a living from harvesting acai berries. His trees were destroyed in the construction of the government's new project. Verequete expresses his heartache for his family and other locals, for he fears this act will prompt the continuous exodus of locals, leaving them displaced with nowhere to call home.

BBC along with World Animal Protection address the disturbance that animals too will undergo due to the highway that segregates a stretch of the Amazon nearly down the middle. The shocking photographs have been published by news outlets like BBC, Associated Press, and the Sierra Club, amongst various others as you will find with a quick internet search. Some experts say the extensive divide will disrupt the balance of the Amazonian ecosystem, and World Animal Protection writes of the potential hardships like the restriction of movement and lack of genetic diversity the animal society will experience. Furthermore, Natalia Figuierdo, World Animal Protection’s External Affairs Manager, discloses, “ ‘It is necessary to ensure that highways are adapted and prepared to include biodiversity protection.’ ” World Animal Protection reports that in Brazil approximately 475 million wild animals are killed in road collisions per year- a statistic that should shake humanity to its’ core. 

With the retaliation arising around this project it can be easy to see it just for its flaws. I do not deny the negative impacts that this project may have, but I think we have to remind ourselves of its origin. Avenida Liberdade is the name the highway has acquired, translating to “Avenue of Liberty”. At this point in our world’s history it is critical that COP30 succeeds, and the Brazilian government has stated that the highway will accompany the needs of the animals of the Amazon. Brazilian officials have shown their extreme faith that this amongst other projects will show the world that this meeting will be the beginning of a long awaited union to take action against climate change- the beginning of the road to freedom.

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c9vy191rgn1o

https://www.worldanimalprotection.org/latest/news/amazon-forest-cut-down-for-cop30/

True

Community Rules


• Be respectful
• Always list your sources and include links so readers can check them for themselves.
• Use primary sources when you can, and only go to credible secondary sources if necessary.
• Try to rely on more than one source, especially for big claims.
• Point out if sources you quote have interests that could affect how accurate their evidence is.
• Watch for bias in sources and let readers know if you find anything that might influence their perspective.
• Show all the important evidence, whether it supports or goes against the claim.
...