0 like 8 dislike
by Novice (740 points)
closed ago by
When Doc Brown and Marty meet in the parking lot you can see a sign that says "Twin Pines Mall". Later, after altering the future, the parking lot sign reads "Lone Pines Mall". Could Micheal J Fox have something to do with 9/11? Maybe the guilt of the event caused his Parkinsons disease.
closed

15 Answers

0 like 0 dislike
by Novice (530 points)

The conspiracy theory linking Michael J. Fox to the 9/11 attacks is entirely baseless. It originated from a satirical 2015 YouTube video titled "Back to the Future Predicts 9/11," which employs synchromysticism to draw arbitrary connections between the film's content and the tragic events of September 11, 2001. These interpretations lack any factual foundation and are widely regarded as speculative and unfounded. Furthermore, Michael J. Fox's diagnosis of Parkinson's disease in 1991 is attributed to a combination of genetic and environmental factors, not psychological stress or guilt. There is no scientific evidence linking the onset of Parkinson's disease to such factors. In fact, Fox has been actively involved in philanthropic efforts, including participating in 9/11 memorial fundraising events to support Parkinson's disease research.His foundation has funded significant research initiatives aimed at understanding the causes and progression of Parkinson's disease. In summary, the allegations connecting Michael J. Fox to the 9/11 attacks are baseless and stem from misinterpretations of fictional media content. Such conspiracy theories lack factual support and should be critically evaluated against credible sources.

False
ago by Innovator (57.5k points)
0 0
Great job explaining why you believe the claim is false. What sources did you consult for the fact-check? Please always cite in-text and provide source URLs. Thanks!
0 like 0 dislike
by Newbie (300 points)


 

This claim is false. Michael J Fox and Back to the Future were not predicting 9/11 terrorist attacks in their fictional movie. (https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0088763/)  The likelihood of similarities in a movie and future events is high, given the opportunity to interpret names and signs as symbolic in retrospect. Parkinson's disease is caused by a gene that causes loss of brain cells, and the 9/11 attacks were completed by al-Qaeda. (seniorsinfo.org/parkinsons-faq/when-did-michael-j-fox-get-parkinson#google_vignette and https://www.bbc.co.uk/newsround/14854818

Additionally, the actor was diagnosed in 1991, before the 9/11 attacks. He participated in charity events in support of victims of the 9/11 attacks in 2012. Considering his participation, this would lead one to believe that he would not be supportive of the events that occurred during 9/11.

(Michael J. Fox participates in 9/11 charity event | ABC7 San Francisco | abc7news.com - ABC7 San Francisco)

False
0 like 0 dislike
by Newbie (300 points)

While an interesting take, this is physically impossible and an example of confirmation bias as it's spinning something circumstantial(the directors display of butterfly effect) into something that could relate to a bigger prediction. Then to say this is what could have caused Michael J Fox's Parkinson's is also a very misinformed interpretation of what and how Parkinson's took effect in his life, as well as there being no evidence to confirm from any primary source that this is what happened.

https://www.nia.nih.gov/health/parkinsons-disease/parkinsons-disease-causes-symptoms-and-treatments

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-intersect/wp/2015/10/20/a-youtube-video-claims-back-to-the-future-predicted-911-and-that-isnt-even-the-weird-part/

False
0 like 0 dislike
by Newbie (300 points)
This claim is purely untrue. A simple google search puts the claim next to articles with the titles "conspiracy theories" next to them. That is because the movie "Back to the Future" is a fictitious film and has no real impact on real world events like the tragedy of 9/11. Many of the claims that the "Back to the Future" film predicted anything is solely based in hypotheticals in an alternative reality where there is the idea that something else could have happened instead of the horrible event. And by presenting these ideas that something in a fictional film actually predicted something in the real world is based in ignorance of the real events that happened and trying to lead a false agenda to miscue information.

https://www.thewrap.com/back-to-the-future-predicted-911-and-four-other-crazy-conspiracy-theories/

https://www.imdb.com/news/ni63065866/
False
0 like 0 dislike
by Newbie (220 points)

The claim that Back to the Future predicted 9/11 and that Michael J. Fox was somehow involved is completely false. In the movie, the mall is initially called "Twin Pines Mall," and after Marty McFly changes the past, it becomes "Lone Pine Mall" — a small joke about time travel consequences, not a prediction of future terrorist attacks. There is no credible evidence from the filmmakers or reliable sources supporting the idea that the film predicted 9/11. Additionally, suggesting that Michael J. Fox was involved in 9/11 or that guilt caused his Parkinson’s disease is not only baseless but also factually wrong. Fox was diagnosed with Parkinson’s disease in 1991, a full decade before 9/11, and the disease is known to be caused by a mix of genetic and environmental factors. As the European Commission advises, conspiracy theories often thrive by twisting coincidences into false connections. In this case, all credible evidence shows that Back to the Future was simply a creative story about time travel, and Michael J. Fox has no connection whatsoever to the events of September 11, 2001.

Michael J. Fox Foundation – Michael's Story

IMDb – Back to the Future Conspiracy Theories

Reddit – Discussion on Twin Pines to Lone Pine Mall

Joseph Gordon-Levitt Facebook Post

European Commission – Identifying Conspiracy Theories

Exaggerated/ Misleading

Community Rules


• Be respectful
• Always list your sources and include links so readers can check them for themselves.
• Use primary sources when you can, and only go to credible secondary sources if necessary.
• Try to rely on more than one source, especially for big claims.
• Point out if sources you quote have interests that could affect how accurate their evidence is.
• Watch for bias in sources and let readers know if you find anything that might influence their perspective.
• Show all the important evidence, whether it supports or goes against the claim.
...