1 like 1 dislike
ago by Newbie (270 points)
closed ago by

This claim is TRUE:

The details of the People article include the same information given in a post made by the County Sheriff, no information is exaggerated or changed.

BUT…

 The statement was posted on Facebook, harming its credibility as Facebook is unregulated, and anyone could have made that account.

BUT, BUT…

The same information was reported by the local news. 

closed

3 Answers

2 like 0 dislike
ago by Newbie (480 points)
selected ago by
 
Best answer

This is a True article.It was published by People which is a nationwide news place but it also had a lot of local coverage from Ohio where this story originates from. The information that was included came from the police in the county. There is also 2 channel news stations that broke this news that are near the town of Gallia County where this case comes from. The way I checked was copying the title and looking it up.This story was on the top with multiple others about from bigger outlets like Yahoo. 

https://www.whio.com/news/local/2-adults-3-kids-found-dead-inside-ohio-home-carbon-monoxide-poisoning/NAFKW7ZYQVA4HPNZAJ72GPTS7E/

https://www.fox19.com/2025/04/16/family-5-including-3-children-found-dead-home-carbon-monoxide-poisoning/

True
ago by Newbie (340 points)
0 0
I think adding quotes from either one or possible other articles can strengthen your concise analysis. Perhaps comments from the Facebook page can help strengthen your argument. I do agree with your method of checking the title to see if it pops up the same.
0 like 0 dislike
ago by Newbie (340 points)
The claim about carbon monoxide poisoning can be deemed as true as the police, a credible source, concluded that the deaths derived from carbon monoxide poisoning. The fact that a police report revolves the same understanding of the article title suggests that this article can be trustworthy. Furthermore, the author of the article is an experienced writer which adds to the credibility of this article. There are several other platforms have reposted covering this issue such as Facebook and Yahoo which don't tend to be very credible sources. The police reported, "Based upon our investigation and the determination made by the Gallia County Coroner, it has been found that these individuals perished as a result of an exposure to carbon monoxide gas inside of their residence," once again proving the credibility of the claim. From this quote we can see an expert analysis on the situation which proves the title of the article, thus confirming that this is a case of carbon monoxide poisoning.

https://www.facebook.com/peoplemag/posts/police-said-the-five-people-including-three-children-who-were-found-inside-an-oh/1075441561116186/
https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/videos/2-adults-3-children-found-163001431.html
True
ago by Innovator (56.4k points)
0 0
Both of your links are for an article written by People, which was also posted by the claim's poster. A strong fact-check would include considerable cross-sourcing and reviewing sources besides the one provided by the claim's poster.
0 like 0 dislike
ago by Newbie (340 points)
Even though the information in the People article seems to be consistent with what the County Sheriff posted on Facebook, there is a serious problem with credibility on the site itself. Because Facebook is unregulated, there is a chance that false information or manipulation will proliferate, particularly since accounts can be easily impersonated. However, since local news organizations are typically held to higher standards of accountability and fact-checking, the same information reported by them lends an air of credibility. To confirm the veracity of the information, it's critical to compare assertions made on social media with those from reputable news sources.
Exaggerated/ Misleading
ago by Innovator (56.4k points)
0 0
You wrote "it's critical to compare assertions made on social media with those from reputable news sources," but where is your critical comparison to determine if the claim is true or not? URLs of sources?

Community Rules


• Be respectful
• Always list your sources and include links so readers can check them for themselves.
• Use primary sources when you can, and only go to credible secondary sources if necessary.
• Try to rely on more than one source, especially for big claims.
• Point out if sources you quote have interests that could affect how accurate their evidence is.
• Watch for bias in sources and let readers know if you find anything that might influence their perspective.
• Show all the important evidence, whether it supports or goes against the claim.
...