2 like 0 dislike
ago by Hero (19.1k points)
edited ago by
Antifa began as a 1932 Stalinist front, not a freedom movement. Its “anti-fascism” was anti-capitalism, and East Germany later used it to brand the Berlin Wall. Today’s Antifa borrows the logo, not the ideals — silencing dissent in the name of justice. It fights fascism by imitating it.

2 Answers

0 like 0 dislike
ago by Visionary (32.6k points)
selected ago by

The claim that Antifa began as a 1932 Stalinist front has some accuracy but requires significant context. According to the Rosa Luxemburg Stiftung, a German government-funded political education organization, the term "Antifaschistische Aktion" was adopted in 1932 by the Communist Party of Germany (KPD) in an attempt to build a cross-party alliance with socialists against rising fascism. However, there is no continuous institutional lineage from those groups to present-day movements. Many post-war antifascist committees were dissolved, suppressed, or absorbed into larger political structures, as documented in "Right Wing Extremism in Europe," published by the Friedrich Ebert Foundation. Yale analysis similarly confirms there is no unbroken organizational continuity from 1930s Antifaschistische Aktion to 21st-century antifa movements.

Modern American antifa more likely traces its roots to the Anti-Racist Action group formed in the 1980s, according to EBSCO. In recent years, antifa has gained attention during high-profile protests, particularly those surrounding right-wing movements and the Black Lives Matter demonstrations following George Floyd's death in 2020.

While the modern antifa movement shares a name with rhetoric used by communist regimes in East-Central Europe to suppress political dissent, contemporary anti-fascist activism is structurally and ideologically distinct from its 1932 namesake. The claim greatly oversimplifies antifa's origins and falsely attributes Soviet communist party goals to a decentralized group of American leftists.

Further, the claim that antifa "silences dissent" is difficult to substantiate. There have been instances of violence related to antifa protests (the White House published a tidy list of these recently) such as the 2017 cancellation of Portland's Avenue of Roses Parade after threats over a Republican-themed float, as reported by Politico. However, clear attribution to specific groups is often never established. Further, because antifa is a decentralized movement, it holds little power over major media organizations or political institutions. On the contrary, opposition to and criticism of antifa remains widespread in public discourse. The Trump White House has been very vocal about Antifa, and recently designated the group as a terrorist organization. In the past several years the movement has faced numerous disinformation campaigns, including claims that they were starting wildfires, and, according to Oregon Public Broadcasting, a Department of Defense report revealed that senior DoD leadership "pushed unfounded conspiracies about antifascists, encouraged staff to violate constitutional rights, and made spurious connections between protesters who engaged in criminal activity." This lack of narrative control suggests that 'antifa' as a group is not in a position of power to meaningfully silence dissenters. 

Exaggerated/ Misleading
ago by Novice (650 points)
0 0
I liked that you consider the argument mainly focuses from the point of view of nowadays society problems mentioning both Antifa, as a violent and nonviolent organization. And that, from yours links to the trustable news, such as "The White House" or "Rosa Luxemburg Stiftung", you could prove that this point of view can go both ways, and that is why this fact-check is misleading/ exaggerated
0 like 0 dislike
ago by Novice (650 points)

Having done a lot of research about what happened in 1932, and how anti fascism, Stalin, freedom, East Germany, Berlin Wall is related. This fact-check is an opinion based on historical facts, and tendencies.

The primary source they used is a Twitter account with even amount of followers, and following, a guy named Chris Abraham, no further information. Therefore, this fact-check, seems to me more like an opinion about the historical events. And, I am going to explain how this argument is an opinion.

"Antifa began as a 1932 Stalist front, not a freedom movement. Its 'antifascism' was anti-capitalism, and East Germany later used it to brand the Berlin Wall" -  At the time (1932), the two main political views that were seen was fascism, and communism (known also as stalinism), Both opposite political views. Fascism stands for authoritarian, dictator leader, aggressive nationalism, anti democratic, and totalitarian ideology. On the other hand, communism stands for uniting all the working classes as one, democratic, and anti-private property. 

With all these definitions being said, this argument considers anti fascism being anticapitalist, which was Stalin political position. And Stalin did this from in 1932 because of the Holodomor, a terrible famine that happened in the Soviet Republic of Ukraine that peaked in 1932-33, under Stalin's presidency. This is why this front was not a freedom movement against fascism, in the meaning of authoritarian mode of government, which restricted the freedom from their citizens, This front was mainly trying to make Ukraine's citizens not see all the damage Stalin's government has made.

Later, these political differences in the Soviet Union, both by Germany and Ukraine, were seen when the Berlin Wall was built taking apart East Germany and West Germany, both of them being completely different political views. Therefore, this part of the argument is completely true that they are influenced.

"Today's Antifa borrows the logo, not the ideals - silencing dissent in the name of justice. It fights fascism by imitating it" This second part of the argument gets trickier, because I had to look up how is Antifa related to nowadays politics, and I found a news' article in BBC.

President Donald Trump has signed an executive order designating Antifa as a "domestic terrorist organization". In the root of the radicalized ideas this organization provides, that is why is contradictory with being antifascist, because fascism is mainly authoritarian, leaving no room for opposition, which is exactly what this organization is doing, and the reason why this statement says so.

ANTIFA: https://www.britannica.com/topic/fascism

BERLIN WALL MEANING: https://www.khanacademy.org/humanities/art-1010/architecture-design/late-modernismpost-modernism/a/the-berlin-wall-as-a-political-symbol-edit#:~:text=In%20the%20late%201970s%20and,make%20their%20mark%20on%20it.&text=Thierry%20Noir%20is%20one%20of,existence%20in%20their%20daily%20lives.

FASCISM: https://www.ala.org/sites/default/files/2025-01/SRRT%20Pathfinder%20Fascism.pdf

STALIN HISTORY: https://www.britannica.com/place/Ukraine/The-famine-of-1932-33-Holodomor

COMMUNISM IN THE SOVIET UNION: https://www.oerproject.com/en/oer-materials/oer-media/html-articles/origins/unit8/communism-in-the-soviet-union

 NAZISM/FASCISM:https://www.britannica.com/event/Nazism

BBC TODAY'S ANTIFA ARTICLE: https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/ced5gqn0p6jo


 

Can't be true or false (Opinion, poem, etc.)

Community Rules


• Be respectful
• Always list your sources and include links so readers can check them for themselves.
• Use primary sources when you can, and only go to credible secondary sources if necessary.
• Try to rely on more than one source, especially for big claims.
• Point out if sources you quote have interests that could affect how accurate their evidence is.
• Watch for bias in sources and let readers know if you find anything that might influence their perspective.
• Show all the important evidence, whether it supports or goes against the claim.
...