1 like 0 dislike
by Hero (19.7k points)
edited by
Ukrainians told to ‘cherish’ conscription officers despite violent tactics

3 Answers

1 like 0 dislike
ago by Novice (570 points)

The claim from the story “Ukrainians told to ‘cherish’ conscription officers despite violent tactics” has some truth but is editorialized specifically in its phrasing. Violent conscription practices are real, however, the term ‘cherish’ is added rather than directly quoted from officials. RT is considered to be a low credibility, pro-Kremlin, Russian government funded source by notable sources like Media Bias/Fact Check and NPR. Additionally, Ofcom, a generally reliable and independent body that regulates the UK communications for quality, impartiality, online safety, and more, fined RT in 2019 for serious failures to maintain due impartiality. This doesn’t discredit RT’s claim but rather highly cautions on the source’s reliability.

However, reputable news outlets like Reuters, AP News, and Aljazeera (credibility check: Aljazeera, AP News, Reuters) appear to support the claim that violent recruitment clips did circulate, with officials warning about disinformation, and urging unity. Aljazeera mentions that between January and June 2025, the “Ukrainian Human Rights Ombudsman’s office received more than 2,000 complaints about the use of force by conscription patrols that consist of military and police officers.” AP News reported about a year ago on footage appearing to show conscription officers forcibly detaining some men. With men ages 25-60 eligible for conscription and 18-60 not allowed to leave the country. Additionally, Reuters notes of citizen protests that escalated into violence with draft officers being attacked, one even killed. They cited General Oleksandr Syrskyi calling them ‘shameful acts of violence’ with officials urging the nation’s support and respect of military personnel.

Aljazeera and AP News support that violent tactics are being taken by conscription officers. Meanwhile, Reuters mentions the impacts this has had with protests turning violent and Ukraine urging unity. RT’s editorial phrasing is misleading, but the violent force of conscription officers and public backlash does appear to have truth.

Exaggerated/ Misleading
ago by Novice (510 points)
0 0
Your fact-check presents a well-balanced and nuanced analysis that separates verified elements of the claim from editorial spin, particularly highlighting how RT’s phrasing leans toward propaganda. It also responsibly acknowledges the core truth behind the report, which I greatly appreciate. your analysis encourages critical media literacy without dismissing factual content outright. Excellent rhetoric overall.
0 like 0 dislike
ago by Novice (580 points)

I looked for this in reliable news sources like BBC News, Reuters, and the Kyiv Post. None of them reported any Ukrainian official saying people should “cherish” conscription officers. The Kyiv Post (April 2024) explained that the government is trying to make the draft process more respectful and fix problems with abuse, not celebrate officers. My source is Kyiv Post “Ukraine’s New Mobilization Rules Explained,” April 2024 (https://www.kyivpost.com). There’s no evidence anyone in the Ukrainian government said this. The post takes the idea of improving the draft system and twists it into something misleading.

False
0 like 0 dislike
ago by Novice (600 points)
edited ago by

Violent conscription practices are real; however, there is no verified evidence of a post from the Kiev Regional Territorial Center for Recruitment and Social Support (TCK) urging citizens to “cherish” the TCK or to stop sharing videos of violent conscription. RT is a Russian government-funded outlet, is considered highly biased by reputable sources like  mediabiasfactcheck.com/rt-news/ and www.npr.org/2024/09/25/nx-s1-5114246/russia-today-rt-election-influence-tenet-indictment. This doesn’t automatically invalidate RT’s report, but it raises reasonable caution about the outlet’s reliability.

Reputable news agencies such as Snopes  https://www.snopes.com/news/2025/03/04/video-man-dog-ukraine/,  and Al Jazeera https://www.aljazeera.com/features/2024/10/15/to-boost-ukraines-army-feared-patrols-hunt-for-potential-conscripts#:~:text=Violence%20and%20corruption,to%20let%20a%20man%20go. have documented that videos of aggressive recruitment attempts have circulated.  Al Jazeera reported that between January and June 2025, Ukraine’s Human Rights Ombudsman’s office received over 2,000 complaints about the use of force by military and police-led conscription patrols. AP News also covered footage showing conscription officers forcibly detaining men.

While some Ukrainian officials have warned that violent conscription is a necessary evil to prevail in the warhttps://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/8/8/ukraines-conscription-crisis-alleged-abuse-leads-to-protests-emigration#:~:text=For%20more%20than%20two%20years,seat%20of%20his%20old%20Skoda. , I could not find any record of any Ukrainian official urging citizens to “cherish”  violent conscription tactics, or urge Ukranians to stop sharing videos. According to the Kyiv Post https://www.kyivpost.com/post/32865 the government has focused on reforming the draft process to reduce abuse and improve public trust, not glorifying the officers. There is no evidence that any Ukrainian authority made such a statement.

False

Community Rules


• Be respectful
• Always list your sources and include links so readers can check them for themselves.
• Use primary sources when you can, and only go to credible secondary sources if necessary.
• Try to rely on more than one source, especially for big claims.
• Point out if sources you quote have interests that could affect how accurate their evidence is.
• Watch for bias in sources and let readers know if you find anything that might influence their perspective.
• Show all the important evidence, whether it supports or goes against the claim.
...