6 like 0 dislike
ago by Newbie (350 points)

ICE has a big impact on the Hispanic community and making them fear going out to work, go to the grocery store and even afraid of calling the police if they see any crime. "16% of foreign-born Latinos have avoided calling the police or reporting a crime for fear of being questioned about their legal status. Another 15% of foreign-born Latinos have avoided public places like parks or recreation areas, and 14% reported that they have avoided speaking Spanish in public. This survey also found that 10% of foreign-born Latinos are avoiding work situations where they might be asked about their citizenship status" (Brookings.edu, R.Sanchez. Gabriel, Edward D.Vargas, 2025) . These statistics aren't surprising especially with how ICE profiles them  "we asked respondents directly what a white border patrol agent whom they might encounter would assume their race to be, based on their skin color, hairstyle, or facial features." Gabriel R. Sanchez and Edward D.Vargas stated. This proves why many are affected and afraid stepping outside to do their day to day basis things, and has become a fear to many Hispanic/Latino adults but has also become a fear for many kids including those in elementary.

21 Answers

0 like 0 dislike
ago by Newbie (220 points)

This claim, unfortunately, is true. Looking a the cited article from the claim, Brookings found 16% of Latino respondents avoided calling the police out of fear of being detained. Brookings is a legit non-profit research organization that prides itself on being non-partisan. This means the linked source from the claim is likely aiming to be as non-biased as possible. I also looked into recent events of racial profiling and came across an article from the American Immigration Council about a Supreme Court ruling in LA. The article cited the Noem v. Vasquez ruling, which overruled a previous ruling that prohibited immigration officers from detaining suspected illegal immigrants based on race or ethnicity. I was able to find the ruling report from both the concurring and dissenting perspectives. In the concurring report by Justice Brett Kavanaugh, he wrote, "The Immigration and Nationality Act authorizes immigration officers to 'interrogate any alien or person believed to be an alien as to his right to be or to remain in the United States.'" He later cited the 4th Amendment as a reason for these stops. The dissenting report also states that it was the "Government's application" for this appeal, meaning the US government called for the appeal and not any real legal processes. According to the article from the American Immigration Council, this ruling essentially gives ICE agents the "green light" to detain suspected illegal immigrants, and does not prohibit racial profiling. The concurring report also called ethnicity a "relevant factor" for detaining suspected illegal immigrants. 

The dissenting opinion of the ruling called out the hypocrisy of the Noem v. Vasquez ruling, citing the earlier ruling, which prohibited racial profiling in detaining suspected illegal immigrants. Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote in her dissenting report:

"..a majority of this Court decides to take the once-extraordinary step of staying the District Court’s order. That decision is yet another grave misuse of our emergency docket. We should not have to live in a country where the Government can seize anyone who looks Latino, speaks Spanish, and appears to work a low-wage job. Rather than stand idly by while our constitutional freedoms are lost, I dissent."

As another commentator pointed out, the ruling not only allows racial profiling but also seems to encourage it. Justice Kavanaugh's ruling also seems to be biased, as he also claimed in his report that many illegal immigrants were coming into the country to cause harm. It seems policymakers are including their own prejudices in their endorsement of racial profiling by immigration officers. 

True
0 like 0 dislike
ago by Newbie (290 points)

After doing research I came to the conclusion that this article is true. Brooks is a reliable non profit organization in which they do in depth analysis on policy on a worldwide level, they have a slight left bias but nonetheless its a very credible source. They did claim that a recent supreme court decision has allowed for this racial profiling to happen and they referenced the official supreme court document which I will link at the bottom of this entry. I have found an article by The Guardian that supports this article as it says that this racial profiling has affected daily life, "Some US citizens of colour have decided to change the way they live their day to day lives … carrying identification cards at all times or choosing not to speak languages other than English in public.”(The Guardian). The Guardian has a affiliation with this due to their slight left leaning morale in which they stand against ice and the racial profiling of immigrants. To further back these claims in the official supreme court document they claim, "The goverment sometimes makes brief investigative stops to check theimmigration status of those who gather in locations where people are hired for day jobs; who work or appear to work in jobs such as construction, landscaping, agriculture, or carwashes that often do not require paperwork and are therefore attractive to illegal immigrants.."(SupremeCourt.gov). This provides further explanation as to why foreign born lations are avoiding public places such as these. 

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/sep/23/citizens-permanent-residents-racial-profiling-ice-immigration

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf/25a169_5h25.pdf

True
0 like 0 dislike
ago by Newbie (220 points)

After looking into this claim it looks to be true. The author of this claim cited Brookings as their source. Brookings is a real source that is a nonprofit organization based in Washington, D.C with a mission to conduct in-depth nonpartisan research to improve policy and governance at local, national, and global levels. In the article, they use sources such as a Supreme Court Ruling Noem v. Vasquez Perdomo. Where this decision allows for ICE to racially profile by what car people drive, where they seem to work, if they speak Spanish or English, and by their apparent race or ethnicity. The claim also uses statistics that are indeed in the article. These percentages were collected by the Pew Research Center, which is a well-known reliable source.  In conclusion this claim is true due to the evidence it has to back it up and the use of credible sources helps with making sure the claim is true.

Sources:

https://www.brookings.edu/articles/racial-profiling-by-ice-will-have-a-marked-impact-on-latino-communities/

https://www.pewresearch.org/race-and-ethnicity/2023/09/20/latinos-views-of-and-experiences-with-the-spanish-language/

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf/25a169_5h25.pdf

True
0 like 0 dislike
ago by (190 points)

The claim stated is true, based on the source that is provided above, it is safe to say that this is a legitimate source of information. The source “Racial profiling by ICE will have a marked impact on latino communities” by Gabriel R Sanchez and Edward D Vargas states many real life situations that show how ICE targets the latino community and how it affects many aspects of one’s life who fits into the “mexican” stereotype.  To add on, as I was looking into the source I had come across that Brookings is a non profit organization that analyzes this information and interprets it into sources to inform others. Not only is Brookings supporting the claim that latinos are being targeted by ICE but other sources like “American immigration council” that is a fact based and well cited source is also discussing how the U.S supreme court issued a decision that clears the way for racial profiling during immigration raids and sweeps. This tells us that ICE is allowed to stop and question anyone who they suspect to be an immigrant. According to CBS news a south florida man says he is traumatized from being stopped twice in two weeks by ICE who demanded to see his identification despite being a U.S citizen.They zip tied him up and took him to the back of the store where other detainees were sitting on the side walk, then he was released just for him to get detained again the following week just because of his appearance. Not only are we getting a real life situation of ICE racially profiling an individual but it is law that you must have a valid reason to ask for identification not just because you assume one is an immigrant because of their skin color. In conclusion, this shows us how ICE is discriminating and racially profiling individuals who fit the latino stereotype. 

Sources: https://www.cbsnews.com/miami/news/south-florida-man-says-he-was-twice-stopped-by-ice-claims-racial-profiling/ 

https://www.americanimmigrationcouncil.org/blog/supreme-courts-decision-racial-profiling-immigration-raids/


 

True
0 like 0 dislike
ago by Newbie (230 points)

The claim that ICE racially profiles mainly the Hispanic/Latinx community is true. There’s strong evidence that Latino people are often targeted or treated differently by immigration enforcement. In 2025, a federal court in Los Angeles found that ICE agents were stopping and detaining people based on their race, language, and type of work (Vasquez Perdomo v. Noem, ACLU of Southern California). The judge ruled that these actions violated constitutional rights, showing that profiling wasn't just a perception, it was happening in real communities. Even though the Supreme Court later paused that order (Noem v. Vasquez Perdomo, Supreme Court of the United States), the case revealed how deep these problems go.

Studies also back this up. A 2025 Brookings report by Gabriel R. Sanchez and Edward D. Vargas found that 16% of foreign-born Latinos avoided calling the police, 15% stayed away from public places, and 14% avoided speaking Spanish in public because they feared being questioned about their legal status. That shows how ICE's actions create fear that spreads throughout Latino communities, even among those here legally.

While ICE officially claims it doesn’t use racial profiling, the reality on the ground shows otherwise. Latino people are the main group affected by ICE's tactics, and that fear has become part of daily life for many families.

Sources:

Noem v. Vasquez Perdomo, Supreme Court of the United States, 8 Sept. 2025. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf/25a169_5h25.pdf
 

Vasquez Perdomo v. Noem, ACLU of Southern California. https://www.aclusocal.org/en/cases/vasquez-perdomo-v-noem
 

Sanchez, Gabriel R., and Edward D. Vargas. “Racial Profiling by ICE Will Have a Marked Impact on Latino Communities.” Brookings Institution, 16 Oct. 2025. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/racial-profiling-by-ice-will-have-a-marked-impact-on-latino-communities/


“How the Supreme Court’s Latest Decision Clears the Way for Racial Profiling During Immigration Raids.” American Immigration Council, 9 Sept. 2025. https://www.americanimmigrationcouncil.org/blog/supreme-courts-decision-racial-profiling-immigration-raids

True
0 like 0 dislike
ago by Newbie (220 points)
This claim is true, with multiple trusted sources such as Brookings a credible educational journal, and a direct quote from the supreme court stating their intent to target Spanish speaking individuals. More evidence that supports this claim are articles from main news publishing sites such as MSNBC with articles claiming ICE is targeting home depot's, grocery stores, and hospitals to interrogate as many people as possible.

 

sources: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf/25a169_5h25.pdf

https://www.brookings.edu/articles/racial-profiling-by-ice-will-have-a-marked-impact-on-latino-communities/

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/home-depots-become-prime-locations-immigration-enforcement-rcna226643
True
0 like 0 dislike
ago by Newbie (370 points)
This claim is true. There are multiple legitimate sources that support this claim. For example, Stanford Law School published on Noem v. Vazquez Perdomo, a Supreme Court ruling supporting ICE's use of racial profiling in immigration policing (https://law.stanford.edu/2025/09/24/whose-common-sense-some-reflections-on-noem-v-vazquez-perdomo/). A comment in the Yale Journal on Regulation similarly described the impact of this decision as "greenlighting sweeping racial-profiling detentions," (https://www.yalejreg.com/nc/balancing-in-the-shadows-of-noem-v-vasquez-perdomo-by-avi-siegal/). The Cato Institute, often considered conservative in its views, has published reports on data obtained from ICE: of the 16,000+ street arrests of immigrants with no prior criminal records from January 20 through July, 2025, the large majority - about 90% - were Latino (https://www.cato.org/blog/1/5-ice-arrests-are-latinos-streets-no-criminal-past-or-removal-order).
True
0 like 0 dislike
ago by (190 points)

This is true. The supreme court decision does allow detainment using racial profiling. The survey that Brookings mentions is a legitimate and recent survey, taken from April 23rd to May 13.   The supreme court ruling was in September, so these impacts on the Hispanic community have probably worsened since the survey was taken. Brookings is a legitimate research institution that conducts research in social sciences. The writers Edward D. Vargas and Gabriel R. Sanchez both have experienced backgrounds in this field of research. 

True
0 like 0 dislike
ago by (180 points)

This claim by Rachel_Ruiz_Tamay is about ICE racially profiling Hispanics more than other ethnicities. Many people have brought attention to this claim with 18 answers and 6 supports. The person that published this obviously wants to bring attention to a very important issue. This claim goes farther than what the government is doing, it goes as far as racism. These users brought sources to their claim and used percentages to back up their claims made.

Salud Carbajal published an article about Latino communities being marked and impacted which has led to racial profiling. “In July, a federal judge issued an order that stopped ICE from targeting people based on race, language, and work. However, this week the Supreme Court temporarily lifted the order while the case continues.” (Salud Carbajal). It seems that they may have mostly gotten their information from observing and investigating.

https://carbajal.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=3343

True
0 like 0 dislike
ago by (180 points)

This claim is true. ICE does racially profile mainly the Hispanic/Latinx community. The source provided is a non-profit that is trustworthy and educational. They conduct non-partisan research, in-depth research. Therefore, they are providing accurate information on the overturning of the Supreme Court case, and are correct in explaining the racial profiling that is happening. Another source I looked over is the US Immigration and Customs Enforcement website. They have statistics listed on removals and expulsions from the country. After taking a closer look at these statistics, it is obvious to see that most of the removals and expulsions are of people from Southern American countries, proving that they are targeting a specific group of people. According to the American Immigration Council, with the overturning of the recent Supreme Court case, ICE has been granted more rights to stop people who “look like” they could be an illegal immigrant. These qualifications could be based on race or the language they speak or how they look. Any of these qualifications now, give ICE the right to stop anyone and question them. Therefore, the claim that ICE racially profiles mainly the Hispanic/Latinx community is true. 

Sources: https://www.ice.gov/statistics

https://www.americanimmigrationcouncil.org/blog/supreme-courts-decision-racial-profiling-immigration-raids/

True

Community Rules


• Be respectful
• Always list your sources and include links so readers can check them for themselves.
• Use primary sources when you can, and only go to credible secondary sources if necessary.
• Try to rely on more than one source, especially for big claims.
• Point out if sources you quote have interests that could affect how accurate their evidence is.
• Watch for bias in sources and let readers know if you find anything that might influence their perspective.
• Show all the important evidence, whether it supports or goes against the claim.
...