0 like 0 dislike
by Newbie (270 points)
On October 30, 2025, Disney-owned channels—including ESPN and ABC—were pulled from YouTube TV after the two companies failed to reach a new carriage agreement. The dispute centers around pricing: YouTube TV, owned by Google, claims Disney demanded “costly economic terms” that would raise subscription prices and reduce viewer choice. Disney, on the other hand, accuses Google of using its market dominance to undercut industry standards. As a result, popular programming like Monday Night Football, NBA games, and college sports became inaccessible to YouTube TV users, prompting frustration and a scramble for alternatives.

The blackout has had ripple effects across the media landscape, with sports fans seeking other platforms like Hulu + Live TV, Sling TV, and Fubo to maintain access. Disney has reportedly offered concessions, including a deal “that would cost less overall than the terms of our recently expired license,” but negotiations remain stalled. YouTube TV has promised a $20 credit to affected subscribers if the outage continues, but no resolution timeline has been announced. For the latest updates, you can read the full coverage on.

3 Answers

0 like 0 dislike
ago by Novice (940 points)
selected ago by

This claim is true. Since October 30th, YouTube TV has been in a dispute with Disney costing millions of subscribers to be without coverage of ESPN, ABC, and other Disney owned channels. According to Syracuse.com, "At the heart of this blackout is a contractual disagreement between Google-owned YouTube TV and Disney. YouTube TV claims that Disney is asking for terms that would increase costs for subscribers, while Disney argues that YouTube TV is not valuing its content fairly". It is unclear how long this dispute will last but what is known is the uproar from people voicing their concerns online. 

A main part of the uproar that is upsetting millions of subscribers is the blackout of ESPN/ABC. ESPN airs some of the most important sporting events such as Monday Night Football, college football, basketball, and so much more. ESPN knows how many of their viewers come from YouTube TV which is why they posted an article showcasing the other outlets that you can find ESPN coverage on. The article states, "If you don't have cable access to ESPN right now, you can get instant access to ESPN content through a variety of services including Cox, Dish, DirecTV, Fios, Fubo, Hulu + Live TV, Mediacom, Optimum, Sling, Spectrum TV and Xfinity". This dispute comes at a great disadvantage for millions of subscribers. As they look for different ways to continue to watch their favorite channels it can be very costly.

YouTube TV's response has been to offer $20 rebate. The Columbus Dispatch reported on the controversy that has arisen from the rebate, "For many subscribers, $20 is only a fraction of the typical base subscription fee—about $82.99 a month—and doesn’t fully compensate for the loss of major networks during key sporting events". This dispute has put many in unfortunate situations with no end it sight. I tried reaching out to YouTube TV for a comment of the dispute but received no response back.  

True
0 like 0 dislike
ago by Newbie (270 points)

This claim is true.

Disney is requiring higher fees than computers, which has caused a dispute between the two companies. ESPN and ABC are no longer on YouTube TV since October 30th. This has cause users to use alternative streaming services to watch Disney's programs, however Disney is loosing 30 million dollars each week from this dispute. According to USA TODAY and Business Insider, YouTube TV users are able to claim a $20 credit for the inconvenience caused by the dispute.  

https://www.businessinsider.com/disney-loss-estimate-youtube-tv-dispute-espn-morgan-stanley-2025-11

https://www.usatoday.com/story/tech/2025/11/10/youtube-tv-20-dollar-credit-disney-dispute/87191970007/ 

https://www.msn.com/en-us/sports/insight/how-to-watch-college-football-for-free-today-during-youtube-tv-dispute/gm-BD676D9855?gemSnapshotKey=BD676D9855-snapshot-3&uxmode=ruby&ocid=edgntpruby&cvid=691112dd5ed44763b1f9b51cf003bd8c&ei=8

True
0 like 0 dislike
ago by Newbie (460 points)

This claim is true and most of the supporting details are also very relevant. Disney has launched a new deal for 29.99$ for 1 year and that includes Disney +, Hulu, and ESPN unlimited. With that in affect, Disney and YouTube could not reach an agreement over keeping ESPN and Disney owned channels on YouTube. This has left a lot of consumers a bit disgruntled as one of the big issues is Disneys massive conglomerate concentrating its ownership in attempt to take more and more control. Consumers are left no option but to purchase another subscription, if they choose to obviously but the issue lies in consumers having to have more and more subscriptions because of the fragmentation of content. It is quite the inconvenience as consumers often are saying “I just want to watch the game why has it become so hard?” YouTube has since offered a 20$ rebate to compromise for the loss of ESPN as a lot of consumers had YouTube TV primarily to watch their favorite sports games. 

https://www.usatoday.com/story/tech/2025/10/31/disney-youtube-tv-dispute-abc-espn-channels-pulled/87004871007/

True

Community Rules


• Be respectful
• Always list your sources and include links so readers can check them for themselves.
• Use primary sources when you can, and only go to credible secondary sources if necessary.
• Try to rely on more than one source, especially for big claims.
• Point out if sources you quote have interests that could affect how accurate their evidence is.
• Watch for bias in sources and let readers know if you find anything that might influence their perspective.
• Show all the important evidence, whether it supports or goes against the claim.
...