0 like 0 dislike
ago by Newbie (200 points)
ChatGPT said:

The article argues that while AI can already handle tasks like camera tracking, highlight creation and basic commentary, it still can’t capture the emotional intuition that makes live sports feel alive. Automated production is great for small or lower-tier sports because it lowers costs and expands access, but top-level broadcasts rely on human directors who sense momentum, tension and the story unfolding in real time. AI can recognize events, but it can’t understand their meaning or feel the atmosphere that shapes how a moment should be shown. The most realistic future is a partnership: AI manages the technical workload while humans bring the instinct, creativity and emotional awareness that turn a match into a compelling story.

Please log in or register to answer this question.

Community Rules


• Be respectful
• Always list your sources and include links so readers can check them for themselves.
• Use primary sources when you can, and only go to credible secondary sources if necessary.
• Try to rely on more than one source, especially for big claims.
• Point out if sources you quote have interests that could affect how accurate their evidence is.
• Watch for bias in sources and let readers know if you find anything that might influence their perspective.
• Show all the important evidence, whether it supports or goes against the claim.
...