0 like 0 dislike
by (160 points)

The article makes the argument that the United States is headed into a severe energy supply and cost crisis as a result of the Trump administration's energy policies. Trump increased oil and gas output and pledged an era of "drill, baby, drill," but he also reduced or eliminated hundreds of billions of dollars in tax cuts and subsidies for low-carbon research and renewable energy. Concurrently United States' electricity demand is expected to increase by roughly 25% by 2030, partly due to the growth of data centers and AI infrastructure. According to the article, the United States runs the risk of running out of electricity and incurring greater costs since demand is rising but renewable energy sourcesthe quickest and most affordable means to provide it—are being neglected.

The main argument is that Trump's energy policy, which prioritizes fossil fuels and reduces investment in renewable energy, is not only worsening the climate (by increasing emissions) but also increasing the likelihood of a "energy emergency" in the United States, which could result in a shortage of electricity for consumers and businesses, longer wait times for new power infrastructure (such as gas turbines), and ultimately higher energy costs.

Please log in or register to answer this question.

Community Rules


• Be respectful
• Always list your sources and include links so readers can check them for themselves.
• Use primary sources when you can, and only go to credible secondary sources if necessary.
• Try to rely on more than one source, especially for big claims.
• Point out if sources you quote have interests that could affect how accurate their evidence is.
• Watch for bias in sources and let readers know if you find anything that might influence their perspective.
• Show all the important evidence, whether it supports or goes against the claim.
...