https://www.nytimes.com/2025/09/11/health/california-abortion-pill-protections.html?smid=url-share
This article states that this measure was taken to protect patients privacy and reduce evidence available for states in which abortion is banned, as well as address the stigma surrounding abortions. Critics of the bill include pro-life supporters and some medical professionals, although they did not formally take a stand in opposition. Though the author does not take a clear stance in support or opposition toward the bill, her contact information is easily accessible.
https://www.gov.ca.gov/2025/09/26/governor-newsom-signs-new-landmark-laws-to-protect-reproductive-freedom-patient-privacy-amid-trumps-war-on-women/
Although there is no single source referenced in this article’s description of the bill, I figured this information must be accessible to residence of California. Gavin Newsom’s page on the ‘Official website of the State of California’ confirms the bill’s passing and offers a very similar description to the one give in the NYT article.
Thus, the claim can be assessed as true, although I could not find solid enough evidence to validity the counter-arguments included in the article. There were also other secondary source reaction-pieces published regarding the issue, further claiming its accuracy.