After looking into this claim, I found that it is misleading. The number being used comes from border encounter data, not from the number of unique people who entered and stayed in the U.S. Border encounters can include the same person more than once and also include people who were expelled or removed. Because of this, the claim oversimplifies the data and makes it sound more definitive than it actually is.
CBP publishes monthly data on southwest border encounters. These numbers reflect encounters with migrants, not unique individuals, and can include the same person multiple times. CBP explicitly cautions against interpreting encounters as total entries into the U.S. https://www.cbp.gov/newsroom/stats/southwest-land-border-encounters
DHS provides explanations of immigration enforcement actions and removals. The data clarifies that many individuals encountered at the border are expelled or removed rather than allowed to remain in the country. https://ohss.dhs.gov/
Reuters provides context on how border encounters are tracked and why these figures are frequently misinterpreted in political discourse. https://www.reuters.com/world/us/
Government agencies like CBP and DHS may present data in ways that reflect enforcement priorities, but they provide primary data and methodological explanations. Secondary sources such as Snopes and Reuters aim to clarify misinformation, though they may be perceived as biased depending on audience political beliefs. However, they cite primary data and explain limitations transparently.
There is evidence that millions of border encounters have occurred during the Biden administration. Large cumulative numbers exist in CBP data, which may give the impression of a very high level of border activity.
The claim incorrectly equates encounters with unique individuals who entered and stayed in the U.S. Evidence from CBP and DHS shows that encounters include repeat crossings and people who were expelled or removed. Therefore, the statement that “15 million illegals entered the U.S.” is not supported by how the data is defined.
The claim appears to originate from a social media post on Bluesky. I attempted to contact the user who shared the claim by messaging them on the platform to ask for clarification on the source of the figure. I did not receive a response.