Think of this as your investigation log. Answer each question to explain what you discovered and how you got there.
1. Write a brief overall summary of your findings.
I found that this was completely false news. It was completely mixed up because she did date someone who was recently convicted of fraud and money laundering. There is no credible evidence that Anne Hathaway stole retirement funds or participated in the fraud
2. What primary sources did you find (e.g., transcripts, videos of politician speeches, tweets from public figures, scientific studies)? For each source, write at least one or two sentences explaining what you learned. Include all links.
https://www.thecut.com/2018/06/remember-the-time-anne-hathaway-dated-a-con-man.html
The cut is a well trusted site that many use for gossip and news involving celebrities around the world. In this article it only talked about Hathaway dating a con man back in 2008. He was convicted on 14 counts of wire fraud but this was conducted back in 2003 and gained power over the years and then came into contact with Hathaway.
3. What secondary sources did you find (e.g., newspapers, magazines)? Only use secondary sources if sufficient primary sources are not available. For each source, write at least one or two sentences explaining what you learned. Include all links.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/anne-hathaways-ex-pleads-guilty/
https://graziamagazine.com/articles/anne-hathaway-ex-boyfriend/
On the CBS news website it just talked about her ex Raffaello Follieri and how he was facing 5 years in prison and his case but it said she didn't have any involvement in his crimes.
4. What potential biases or interests might each of your sources have?
The CBS is factual news whereas the Cut just follows celebrities and drama. They both covered the story and said Hathaway had no involvement in his convictions of fraud.
5. What evidence supports the claim you are fact-checking?
She later cooperated as a witness to his convictions and was proven innocent in his crimes via CBS news.
6. What evidence undermines the claim you are fact-checking?
She never "escaped" punishment by testifying and is was proven. In the article Grazia New magazine a quote was taking from her ex... “I think she made a business decision,” he continues. “She decided saving her career was most important. I am not bitter. You can look in my eyes. I don’t have anger but I’ve been hurt.” She left him because of his crimes and wasn't involved.