While your claim was very well done along with strong supportive sources, I do not understand why the title claim is the completely opposite. The claim clearly described the situation, the background story, and the reasoning. The four attached sources each served a different purpose. The two news reports provided the true facts about drinking borax and the negative influences of social media, and the source about the uses and risks of borax helped to point the reader the correct direction to do more research. And the TikTok source represented the false information spread by social media.