I'd be interested to see what other sources have to say about the inaccuracies within the series, mainly because the claims in this article are from one of the brothers themselves. A nonbiased third party's analysis of the case would likely have better credibility. Naturally, it would be in Erik's best interest to contest the show, and to keep asserting the claims they used as defense in the trial. This is also the case for Ryan Murphy, obviously Murphy would oppose the claims from Erik Menendez as it is his show and he stands to lose credibility as a result of Erik's claims.