0 like 0 dislike
in General Factchecking by (150 points)
edited by
The NBA community has been questioning the situation around the free throw disparity between other teams and the LA Lakers. Specifically how the Lakers take more free throws than the rest of the league teams. But not just because of the play-style the Lakers have, but because of the unfair officiating which led certain teams and players to believe in a conspiracy that the referees are biased towards the Lakers.
by Apprentice (1.3k points)
0 0
How do you think this might affect LeBron’s legacy?
by (150 points)
0 0
Lebron James is still considered as one of the best basketball players in the NBA even at 39 years old. Being one of the biggest superstars in the league, this could affect his legacy in a bad way because of how the NBA community could imply that he is getting help from the officials to win games. Which would be unfair and not allowed. This would damage both his career and legacy.

2 Answers

0 like 0 dislike
by Novice (600 points)
selected by
 
Best answer
The Lakers lead the NBA in free throw differential since the 2022-23 season by a whopping +1017, with the next closest team only having a +358. If the difference was within about 100, you could make some points as to why the Lakers are better at avoiding contact on defense and creating contact on offense. Austin Reaves, Anthony Davis, and LeBron James are skilled at doing this on both sides of the ball at an elite level. But for the Lakers to have almost three times more than the 2nd most team, you have to believe some other factor is affecting the differential. This YouTube video breaks down examples of Austin Reaves, and how he creates contact on his drives to get calls to go his way. The video also mentions guys like Jarred Vanderbilt and Anthony Davis who defend at All-Defensive Team levels and know how to play efficient defense while not contacting the shooter enough for the referee to blow the whistle.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?app=desktop&v=ZfGsABlGrAM
True
by Novice (660 points)
0 0
Implementing the video with breakdowns of plays and calls made it extremely easy to digest the analysis of this claim as well as have a visual for others to develop their own take on the calls. The only thing I would say could be added is statistics on the refs and the amount of calls they tend to miss vs get right. Although even that info may not be completely necessary as the main point of this analysis is on the players effect on the game rather than the refs'.
0 like 0 dislike
by Newbie (380 points)
In order to present evidence in favor of your general claim, the link that you utilized was effective because it offered statistics not just from the season in which it was occurring at the time but also from seasons that had come before. My opinion is that you should have included the interview in which Darko Rajakovic criticized the officials in his postgame comments. Additionally, you should have mentioned that former Suns coach Monty Williams and Pacers player Tyrese Haliburton also voiced their dissatisfaction with the officials. In my opinion, the provision of this information provides the reader with a greater sense of clarity and offers proper fact checking.

Community Rules


• Be respectful
• Always list your sources and include links so readers can check them for themselves.
• Use primary sources when you can, and only go to credible secondary sources if necessary.
• Try to rely on more than one source, especially for big claims.
• Point out if sources you quote have interests that could affect how accurate their evidence is.
• Watch for bias in sources and let readers know if you find anything that might influence their perspective.
• Show all the important evidence, whether it supports or goes against the claim.
...