0 like 0 dislike
ago in General Factchecking by (160 points)

As a student at UO, I noticed that the school promotes its upperclassman residence halls by claiming that living on campus directly contributes to academic success. UO's website is a high-quality and valid resource because of the school's status as a nationally recognized research institute. The article sharing this claim also includes five scholarly sources to corroborate their statement. However, one crucial limitation in the article is that the studies conducted to test this statement pertain strictly to "FTFTF" or first-time, full-time freshmen. This aspect makes their advertising biased because they omit that their research does not consider upperclassmen. It is also important to consider that the article does acknowledge the potential issue with these "omitted variables." I believe the claim is backed up with substantial evidence, but the presentation is misleading. What do you think? Is this claim legitimate, given the context?

2 Answers

0 like 0 dislike
ago by (180 points)
This is a fantastic factcheck, your research is very thorough. I have seen other sources confirming that living on campus does help students achieve higher success, particularly in areas such as GPA, which makes this a believable claim. However, the majority of these sources also come from Universities, making them potentially biased as living on campus would bring in more money for the schools.

Other sources:

https://www.tompkinscortland.edu/should-i-live-on-campus#:~:text=Potential%20for%20Better%20Academic%20Outcomes&text=According%20to%20research%2C%20the%20answer,than%20their%20off%2Dcampus%20counterparts.

https://www.gcu.edu/blog/gcu-experience/on-campus-vs-off-campus-comparing-academic-success-outcomes
ago by (180 points)
0 0
Hi, I agree on your analysis here. Good job being able to recognize another perspective. I think this research has to be cross-checked.

 I also wanted to add that the sources that UO is pulling from is not relevant. Some of the reference research dates back to 1997 and 2007, making it less credible. I think it's very key to look at the motive that the university wants to push out. It could be possible that they included this study to convince parents and students to invest their money in living on-campus for the university's benefit.
0 like 0 dislike
ago by (160 points)

I really enjoyed reading this factchecking and thought you were very knowledgeable on this topic. Like another answer gave, it is hard to say if this is extremely beneficial for students to live on campus as most of the articles about this are from schools. With that, they can easily make more money as it is more costly to live on campus rather than somewhere else. However, the Department of Education did say that there is a positive correlation on students, “They find that living on campus does have an immediate positive effect on academic performance” This demonstrates that this is a valid claim to make.

Sources:

https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1058304.pdf

True

Community Rules


Be respectful.

There is bound to be disagreement on a site about misinformation. Assume best intentions on everyone's part.

If you are new to factchecking, take some time to learn about it. "How to Factcheck" has some resources for getting started. Even if you disagree with these materials, they'll help you understand the language of this community better.

News Detective is for uncovering misinformation and rumors. This is not a general interest question-answer site for things someone could Google.

Posting

The title is the "main claim" that you're trying to factcheck.

Example:
Factcheck This: Birds don't exist

If possible, LINK TO to the place you saw the claim.

Answering

LINK TO YOUR EVIDENCE or otherwise explain the source ("I called this person, I found it in this book, etc.")

But don't just drop a link. Give an explanation, copy and paste the relevant information, etc.

News Detective is not responsible for anything anyone posts on the platform.
...