The article is published by CNN Health which is a notable resource that typically shares well-researched topics and information. Taking a deeper look into the content of the article, the author chooses to include a variety of outside sources to enforce the claim that household chemical can cause health problems. When making links to outside sources, the author makes sure to state the information along side the specific name and status of where the data was found. I was able to look up these names like Tasha Stoiber and Jennie Romer and cross references to see if they are reliable sources. All of the people mentioned had some background in regards to health and they contained large scientific titles. Since many of those who were quoted work on health studies, the articles claim is more justifiable. However, when putting focus on the part of the statement that says "2000 household chemicals" are linked to health issues, it seems like a dramatic claim. Yes, the article states that there are a lot of chemicals causing problems, but they don't share enough information for readers to believe in the number 2000. To find further evidence of credibility on this claim, I looked up how many household chemicals lead to health issues to see if other sources had similar statements. There was no other articles that I saw that specifically said 2000 chemicals; in fact most of the articles shared a different number. I still think that the CNN article is accurate but they should focus their statement on the general idea that household chemicals cause health issues. They shouldn't claim a specific number unless there is evidence to support it.