1 like 0 dislike
in General Factchecking by Novice (900 points)
Newspapers across the country have been ditching presidential endorsements, figuring they shouldn't alienate readers with something most of them wont care for.

2 Answers

0 like 0 dislike
by Apprentice (1.1k points)
selected by
 
Best answer

This is true. Both the LA Times and The Washington Post decided not to endorse any candidate for the 2024 presidential election. News sources have been endorsing candidates for basically as long as newspapers have been around. These publications decision not to endorse a candidate is coming from the owners, and has resulted in several editors and senior officials resigning. Journalists worry that they will be the ones affected because people are cancelling subscriptions in anger, subscriptions that pay journalists salaries. The source used above to make this claim, The Associated Press is a not-for-profit news agency that produces stories from all over the world and distributes them to membership organizations all over the U.S. (membership organizations include major news sources like the NYT and major radio and broadcast networks.) The AP is a very reliable source, so claims and articles made by the AP are factual and trustworthy. The article listed above goes into detail about the history of newspaper endorsements and what is means for journalists employed by those organizations. Additionally, this claim is backed up by the news publications themselves. The LA Times and The Washington Post reported that they're seeing a drop in subscriptions after their non-endorsement and The New York Times's had an opinion piece about what the cancellation meant for the election.    

https://apnews.com/article/post-newspaper-endorsements-trump-harris-44efcb29d0b27c039a9b0b259ec255d7

https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2024-10-28/non-endorsement-post-la-times-cancellations

https://www.washingtonpost.com/style/media/2024/10/25/washington-post-endorsement-president/?itid=sr_1_f7b0f1d3-6b4d-4b5e-844a-7d1daf3c7f6f

https://www.npr.org/2024/10/28/nx-s1-5168416/washington-post-bezos-endorsement-president-cancellations-resignations

True
by Novice (830 points)
0 0
While it is true that both the LA Times and Washington Post did not publish an endorsement for the 2024 Presidential election, it does not necessarily reflect nonpartisanship as stated in the above original claim. Biases in the media and always present and perhaps even more so in the case of these publications respective corporate leadership. For example, this article for the NYT's(which, in full disclosure, did publish an endorsement for Harris ahead of the election) reported that Patrick Soon-Shiong, owner of the LA Times, stopped a planned endorsement for Harris because of her stance on the war in Gaza

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/10/26/us/los-angeles-times-endorsement-soon-shiong.html
0 like 0 dislike
by Novice (600 points)

This is true. The Washington Post and the Los Angeles Times did not endorse a presidential candidate during this election. Jeff Bezos, the owner of The Washington Post, issued a statement defending the Post's stance on not endorsing a candidate and reaffirming that this statement is true. The Los Angeles Times owner defended its opinion column by explaining why it would not endorse a candidate affirming the claim made to be true. This claim "Newspapers across the country have been ditching presidential endorsements, figuring they shouldn't alienate readers with something most of them wont care for." It is not true it is reported that the Post has lost approximately 250,000 subscribers and counting. This proves that your claim of "alienating readers with something they won't care" isn't true. 

https://www.washingtonpost.com/style/media/2024/10/29/washington-post-cancellations-number/

https://www.latimes.com/business/story/2024-10-25/latimes-no-presidential-endorsement-decison-resignations

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2024/10/25/washington-post-endorsement/

by Newbie (200 points)
0 0
This is a great take. Your comment brings up a good point about the changing relationship between media outlets and the readers’ expectations especially in divided times.
by Novice (830 points)
0 0
Good take, especially concerning Jeff Bezos business interest

Community Rules


Be respectful.

There is bound to be disagreement on a site about misinformation. Assume best intentions on everyone's part.

If you are new to factchecking, take some time to learn about it. "How to Factcheck" has some resources for getting started. Even if you disagree with these materials, they'll help you understand the language of this community better.

News Detective is for uncovering misinformation and rumors. This is not a general interest question-answer site for things someone could Google.

Posting

The title is the "main claim" that you're trying to factcheck.

Example:
Factcheck This: Birds don't exist

If possible, LINK TO to the place you saw the claim.

Answering

LINK TO YOUR EVIDENCE or otherwise explain the source ("I called this person, I found it in this book, etc.")

But don't just drop a link. Give an explanation, copy and paste the relevant information, etc.

News Detective is not responsible for anything anyone posts on the platform.
...