1 like 0 dislike
in General Factchecking by Newbie (270 points)
The article by Erika Edwards, published on November 7, 2024, discusses the potential threat to fluoridated water systems under the incoming Trump administration, particularly influenced by Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Kennedy, who lacks medical or dental training, has raised concerns about fluoride, calling it harmful and linking it to various health issues. He has expressed the belief that fluoride should be removed from water systems, although the decision to fluoridate water is made at the local level. Dentists, including Dr. Meg Lochary, warn that eliminating fluoride would reverse significant public health progress, as fluoride has been instrumental in reducing tooth decay, especially among children in communities lacking access to dental care. The article emphasizes that major health organizations, such as the CDC and the American Dental Association, support fluoride's role in cavity prevention, noting its historical success in reducing tooth decay by 25%. Despite some studies suggesting possible risks, there is no definitive evidence linking fluoride to negative health outcomes, such as lower IQ levels, and experts continue to affirm its safety and effectiveness.
by Novice (650 points)
0 0
This is an interesting post, and I appreciate the context on fluoride in public health. The article brings up valid points about the potential risks of reducing or eliminating fluoride, especially for communities that rely on it for dental health. However, since local governments decide on water fluoridation, a federal policy shift may not have a direct, immediate impact everywhere. It would be helpful to clarify if the Trump administration has specifically targeted local water fluoridation or if their stance is more about raising awareness.

1 Answer

0 like 0 dislike
by Apprentice (1.6k points)
This claim is leaning to be true. Trump has stated on multiple occasions that he is going to put Robert F. Kennedy in charge of public health when he takes office in January. Like the NBC article linked above in the claim, I have been able to find multiple reputable sources that say that Kennedy is claiming that he will have fluoride removed from drinking water, despite there being no health professionals advising for it to be done. They are actually arguing that the fluoride in the water is benefitting communities more than hurting them. I say this claim is leaning to be true because there is evidence that there are claims of Trump and Kennedy getting rid of Fluoride in water but we won't know what Trump will actually do until he takes office and does it.

https://www.ktvu.com/news/rfk-jr-says-trump-wants-remove-fluoride-from-drinking-water

https://fortune.com/well/article/rfk-jr-fluoride-drinking-water-removed-trump/
True
by Newbie (400 points)
0 0
Your fact-check is well-researched and provides a balanced view of the situation. Here are a few points to consider that could further strengthen your analysis. You correctly identified that multiple reputable sources confirm Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s claims about removing fluoride from drinking water if Trump is elected. This consistency across sources adds credibility to the claim. Both KTVU and Fortune report on Kennedy’s statements and Trump’s support for his stance. Acknowledge the thoroughness of the original fact-check and suggest areas for further exploration. For example, you could recommend looking into the historical context of water fluoridation policies and previous attempts to change them.
by Innovator (50.9k points)
0 0
Is it possible to fact-check something in the future? Maybe this claim could be rated as likely true since Trump hasn't taken office, yet his team are anti-fluoride and it looks like a possibility that fluoride would be removed from water.

Community Rules


Be respectful.

There is bound to be disagreement on a site about misinformation. Assume best intentions on everyone's part.

If you are new to factchecking, take some time to learn about it. "How to Factcheck" has some resources for getting started. Even if you disagree with these materials, they'll help you understand the language of this community better.

News Detective is for uncovering misinformation and rumors. This is not a general interest question-answer site for things someone could Google.

Posting

The title is the "main claim" that you're trying to factcheck.

Example:
Factcheck This: Birds don't exist

If possible, LINK TO to the place you saw the claim.

Answering

LINK TO YOUR EVIDENCE or otherwise explain the source ("I called this person, I found it in this book, etc.")

But don't just drop a link. Give an explanation, copy and paste the relevant information, etc.

News Detective is not responsible for anything anyone posts on the platform.
...