5 like 0 dislike
in General Factchecking by Newbie (430 points)

Overall the title of this article is misleading, to say that we will receive a second smaller moon and to not specify its visibility or characteristics shows encouragement from the news source for the potential reader to click on the article. Although the information is true of an asteroid getting caught in Earth's gravitational pull with a credible source to back it up, the information of its 10-meter diameter compared to the moon's 2,159-mile diameter is withheld from the reader. While it happens fairly commonly that Earth obtains a new moon this will not change the view of the night sky as we know it. Many other big news sources have also covered this event. 

by Novice (650 points)
0 0
Its what scientist think like gravity if it stays in earths gravity it could but it would be a stretch saying it will. Only scientist will know depend on their expirements on that fact
ago by Apprentice (1.1k points)
0 0
It was actually really refreshing that you dissected the article and gave a substantial claim unlike many of the other ones on this platform. I think it's a bit interesting they'd even consider it a "moon" if it's only staying for a brief period of time and is so small.

1 Answer

0 like 0 dislike
by Novice (840 points)

It appears that this mini moon has existed before, but this is the second time the mini moon has come back. They say you have to have professional tools to see the mini moon. They say "the tiny asteroid 2024 PT5, which usually orbits the sun as part of a small asteroid belt that follows Earth".

True
ago by Apprentice (1.6k points)
0 0
Thanks for contributing to the thread. It would be great if you clarified who "they" refers to, or included a link to another source to strengthen your factcheck.
ago by Novice (940 points)
0 0
This is a pretty good fact check. You give some evidence that this claim is true but not entirely new news either. I would add the sources you found which gave you the information to make this fact check. You give a quote but just say "they" and don't say who actually said it or what source the quote was from. Just add the link to the source next time and this would be a good fact check.
ago by Novice (900 points)
0 0
It is interesting that this has happened before, but are there any records of it? Also who is the “they” that you refer to? It is good to know that this is something that in fact has happened before but it is important that we know where the information is coming from.

Community Rules


Be respectful.

There is bound to be disagreement on a site about misinformation. Assume best intentions on everyone's part.

If you are new to factchecking, take some time to learn about it. "How to Factcheck" has some resources for getting started. Even if you disagree with these materials, they'll help you understand the language of this community better.

News Detective is for uncovering misinformation and rumors. This is not a general interest question-answer site for things someone could Google.

Posting

The title is the "main claim" that you're trying to factcheck.

Example:
Factcheck This: Birds don't exist

If possible, LINK TO to the place you saw the claim.

Answering

LINK TO YOUR EVIDENCE or otherwise explain the source ("I called this person, I found it in this book, etc.")

But don't just drop a link. Give an explanation, copy and paste the relevant information, etc.

News Detective is not responsible for anything anyone posts on the platform.
...