1 like 0 dislike
in General Factchecking by Innovator (64.1k points)
UCLA medical school admitted to lowering admission standards for diversity and now many are failing basic tests.

2 Answers

0 like 0 dislike
by Novice (990 points)

After doing some digging, it seems not many news sources have reported on the topic. Though it did become a hot topic on Twitter as Elon Musk and other right-leaning advocates took the time to criticize UCLA and what they call the “woke mind virus”. This article discusses the topic and how UCLA is poorly handling the controversies and accusations. It also has a timeline of the events that led up to the incident of half their students failing important exams. The claim being made is exaggerated as UCLA hasn’t admitted to lowering standards but they do seem to be having struggles with getting students to pass their classes.

https://www.timesnownews.com/world/us/us-news/ucla-medical-school-faces-allegations-of-lowered-standards-amid-affirmative-action-controversy-article-110475690

Exaggerated/ Misleading
by Innovator (64.1k points)
0 0
Do you think this source is legitimate? Did you locate any original sources?

I looks like UCLA has not admitted this since the reporting on this discusses "sources" or people close to the matter.

https://www.campusreform.org/article/ucla-med-students-alarmingly-sub-standard-school-cuts-corners-admits-applicants-based-race/25529
https://californiaglobe.com/fr/race-based-med-school-admissions-the-idiocy-and-danger-of-cultist-dei-policies/
0 like 0 dislike
ago by Champion (14.3k points)

Criticism of the school's move appears to stem largely from an article by Aaron Sibarium published in the Washington Free Beacon. Other publications like Campus Reform have quoted from this piece.

It's true that, according to UCLA's first year student body profiles, the share of black students entering the student body rose from 3% in 2020 to 8% in 2023. However, the article distorts the severity of the consequences of this. Additionally, several factors call the original article's credibility into question. First, all sources cited in the Beacon article are anonymous. Second, according to a Los Angeles Times rebuttal, the article relies on complaints from only eight faculty members out of the school's 5,000+ total faculty. Additionally, the LA Times notes that Sibarium appears to misunderstand the distinction between the student admissions process and the entirely separate process of appointing medical residents—who are medical school graduates, many of whom received their education elsewhere.

One central complaint points to UCLA's fall from 8th to 16th place in U.S. News & World Report's research ranking as evidence that scientific rigor has declined due to affirmative action in admissions. However, this reasoning contains a fundamental flaw: the research ranking tracks faculty activities, not student performance, and therefore has no connection to the incoming class's academic record. UCLA Dean Steven Dubinett expanded on this to the LA Times, saying that the university has assigned more faculty to clinical education rather than research, naturally reducing the grant funding per faculty member—a key metric in the rankings.

Sibarium also claims that UCLA medical students' shelf exam failure rates have "soared" under diversity initiatives. This assertion omits crucial context: UCLA moved these exams a full year earlier in the curriculum in 2020, which naturally caused temporary lower scores as students took the exams with less preparation time.

The complete picture reveals stronger student performance than Sibarium suggests. By the end of their third year, students perform well, with average shelf exam grades above 90% in nearly every clinical discipline.

Exaggerated/ Misleading

Community Rules


• Be respectful
• Always list your sources and include links so readers can check them for themselves.
• Use primary sources when you can, and only go to credible secondary sources if necessary.
• Try to rely on more than one source, especially for big claims.
• Point out if sources you quote have interests that could affect how accurate their evidence is.
• Watch for bias in sources and let readers know if you find anything that might influence their perspective.
• Show all the important evidence, whether it supports or goes against the claim.
...