1 like 1 dislike
in General Factchecking by

"Carolina Prime Pet, Inc. of Lenoir, NC, is recalling 400 16-ounce bags of “Hollywood Feed Carolina Made Chicken Chips” treats for dogs because of potential Salmonella contamination. 

The potential for contamination was noted after testing performed by a third-party laboratory identified contamination in a related yet commercially unreleased lot of the same product."

2 Answers

0 like 0 dislike
by Newbie (380 points)
This claim is very misleading. The link talks about a specific product that was recalled and was found to have caused salmonella. This article is not stating that dog treats cause salmonella, just one specific case where this happened. Another important thing to note is how this page is sponsored by a food safety law firm, likely meaning they advertise these claims so they can get clients. The site is also loaded with ads, possibly meaning they make articles about certain topics and products because of their advertisers. It is very important to look at not only the information presented in a claim, but the site and the way in which it is presented to the reader.
Exaggerated/ Misleading
by Novice (820 points)
0 0
I like how you analyzed the article and listed all the reasons why the claim and the article itself is misleading. However, I also think it's important you add other articles that support your claim. In this case, those articles could be the source of the article the original poster had listed. It could also be any health reports of dog treat brands. Overall though, this was a very good analysis!
by Novice (780 points)
0 0
I really appreciate how deeply you analyzed this claim. I agree with how you stated that this claim can be misleading, because at first glance it seems very generalized which can cause a scare amongst people who do not do their own fact checking. I think if you used some of your own sources as more evidence, this would be even more beneficial!
by Apprentice (1.0k points)
0 0
I like this fact check a lot because you go into detail about the reason why the above article is not reliable but I think adding reliable sources of your own would strengthen your argument. Only talking about why something isn't correct may not convince people that the claim is misleading.
by (180 points)
0 0
I like this fact check a lot because you really dove deep into what the article was talking about regarding the fact it's not necessarily intended to talk about dog treats themselves rather what has been recalled. Does it state other reasons for recall except salmonella? That could also indicate thats not all we should be worried about. Although I think that you should include more sources to your research to back up the first article that you used to factcheck.
by Novice (950 points)
0 0
This comment does a nice job analyzing the claim and listing the reasons why it isn't factual or may be inaccurate but it does lack links to help support it's reasoning. If it had evidence then it would be perfect.
0 like 0 dislike
by Novice (700 points)
This claim is misleading. The article used as evidence for all dog treats causing salmonella only references one specific case where a handful of dog treats were tested for potential contamination. This lead to a recall of the products, but no cases of illness were documented in reference to this specific brand. Only products of that line produced with a specific lot number and expiration date had potential contamination, likely showing a cross-contamination or error in manufacturing. This does not mean all dog treats cause salmonella, or that the ingredients are the cause. I further researched this through the American Veterinary Medical Association, and their FAQ states that since many kinds of pet food contain natural animal products/origins, there is a risk of salmonella or bacteria contamination, which is typically eradicated through proper manufacturing. Surveillance of this potential harm is very diligent and the majority of recalls of these products that have been flagged are simply precautionary.

https://www.avma.org/salmonella-dry-pet-foods-and-pet-treats-faq

https://www.wdbj7.com/2024/11/25/dog-treats-recalled-because-potential-salmonella-risk/
Exaggerated/ Misleading
by Newbie (490 points)
0 0
This is a solid refute of the original claim and does a food job in linking information from reputable and knowledgable sources.

Community Rules


Be respectful.

There is bound to be disagreement on a site about misinformation. Assume best intentions on everyone's part.

If you are new to factchecking, take some time to learn about it. "How to Factcheck" has some resources for getting started. Even if you disagree with these materials, they'll help you understand the language of this community better.

News Detective is for uncovering misinformation and rumors. This is not a general interest question-answer site for things someone could Google.

Posting

The title is the "main claim" that you're trying to factcheck.

Example:
Factcheck This: Birds don't exist

If possible, LINK TO to the place you saw the claim.

Answering

LINK TO YOUR EVIDENCE or otherwise explain the source ("I called this person, I found it in this book, etc.")

But don't just drop a link. Give an explanation, copy and paste the relevant information, etc.

News Detective is not responsible for anything anyone posts on the platform.
...