You’ve done a great job citing a reputable source like Stanford University to support the claim, and the explanation of reverse osmosis (RO) as a treatment process is clear. However, I noticed that the article you linked is from Aquatech, which has a vested interest in promoting water reuse technologies. While this doesn't invalidate the findings, it might be worth cross-referencing with studies from independent organizations or regulatory bodies like the EPA. Did you check if any long-term studies confirm the absence of health risks or evaluate public perception about disinfection byproducts?