0 like 4 dislike
by Apprentice (1.5k points)
edited by
Glyphosate is linked to rising autism rates, but the media isn't addressing it.

6 Answers

0 like 0 dislike
by Novice (900 points)
selected by
 
Best answer

Some studies suggest a possible link between glyphosate exposure and autism, but the evidence isn't strong enough and does not establish connection. Factors like genetics and how it's diagnosed also can influence autism rates. So it appears there is not a strong enough sources to completely back this up.

Can't be true or false (Opinion, poem, etc.)
0 like 0 dislike
by Newbie (220 points)

This is an accurate claim. The link that is provided as evidence is to a site where Zach Bush is a guest on the the Rick and Roll podcast. Upon further research, Zach Bush is a physician specializing in internal medicine, endocrinology and hospice. While he is looked down upon by critics for being biased in this studies due to his own line of treatments for sale, he is one of the only triple board certified MDs which speaks to his credibility. On a different interview (https://www.nourishmeorganics.com.au/blogs/nmo-gut-health-journal/zach-bush-md-on-glyphosate-autism-and-chronic-disease-epidemic) Dr. Bush explains the correlation between autism and Glyphosate. He says that according to data, the US is on track to have 1 in ever 3 children be diagnosed with autism in 2035. He has followed the start of this rise in diagnosis back to the rise in the use of Glyphosate. Glyphosate is a chemical he explains that is used to kill the weeds in crops that end up in the grocery stores as well as the drinking water we consume. These findings are reinforced by a study done by a multitude of scientists that was published in the Proceedings of National Academy of Sciences in the United States of America. They also found the parallel between the rise in the chemical and the rates of ASD. They did testing on animal models specifically maternally and the results came back positive. 

True
by Apprentice (1.3k points)
0 0
You did not link any reputable sources backing up your answer, neither a podcast episode nor a blog post are sufficient. the justification you gave for Zach Bush’s credibility sounds like it came from Bush himself. Additionally, any article that includes the phrase “the media isn’t addressing this” already has an innaccurate claim because that article is part of the media.
by Newbie (230 points)
0 0
I think that using a podcast as justification without any other medical professionals agreeing with Bush isn't enough evidence to submit the claim as false. I also think that pointing out a lack of media attention isn't necessarily a reason why something is true or false, and often points to the fact that a story isn't accurate or fact-checked since it isn't picked up by a major news organization.
by Apprentice (1.3k points)
0 0
My comment merely points out the flaws with that specific fact check. My fact check can be seen below, which includes legitimate sources proving the claim as false.
by Newbie (240 points)
0 0
Where did you get the source for this? Using a podcast isn’t the most reliable, regardless of popularity or following because you can’t tell where they got their information from.
0 like 0 dislike
by Apprentice (1.3k points)
edited by

This claim is false. The link that is provided is to a bluesky post of an episode of a podcast. “the media” is not one entity and there have been multiple reputable articles disproving this claim, so it is false to say that the media isn’t addressing this. The link between glyphosates and autism is correlation rather than causation, as explained in this article from a source rated highly reputable by fact checking sites. The spike in autism diagnoses occurred at the same time that the diagnostic criteria for autism was expanded, suggesting that there aren’t more people with autism being born, but more people being diagnosed that wouldn’t have been earlier in time. 

https://geneticliteracyproject.org/2023/11/13/autism-increase-mystery-solved-no-its-not-vaccines-gmos-glyphosate-or-organic-foods/

False
0 like 0 dislike
by Newbie (260 points)

This is a true claim, A study done by the School of Public Health, Guizhou Medical University in Guiyang, China (here), describes how exposure to glyphosate affects the microbiome in pregnant organisms. This is linked to an increase in autism spectrum disorder. The use of pesticides has increased greatly and with that there is a linked rise in autism. By studying this further we could figure out a more in depth link between the two to find out how to prevent this issue.

True
0 like 0 dislike
ago by Newbie (220 points)

A study done in 2021 supported the theory that glyphosate exposure during pregnancy and lactation was likely linked to Autism Spectrum Disorder behavior abnormalities. Firstly, Glyphosate is a chemical herbicide used in Roundup, and various pesticides. It's dominated in the agricultural world and in the past 3 decades has been used religiously on corn, wheat and soybeans. Glyphosate is shown to stop the production of amino acids in these plants when administered during their growth, and research shown that these crops damage animals gut microbiota. Because glyphosate stays on the crop well after harvest, the chemical has already been found in various studies to increase risk for gastrointestinal disorders like celiacs disease, and leaky gut syndrome.

[1]The study monitored the behavior of male juvenile mice after administration of glyphosate in their water, compared to a control group receiving pure water. The results showed the glyphosate exposed mice experienced social interaction deficits, and abnormal repetitive behaviors. 

A different study [2] connected ASD (Autism Spectrum Disorder) symptoms with [5] gut microbiota dysbiosis, which refers to dysfunction in the process of communication between the gut and the brain by the vagus nerve. They hypothesize that 60% of ASD cases are linked to chemical and environmental factors while 35-40% is linked to genetic factors. Research suggests pesticides, and the herbicide glyphosate can alter the gut microbiota, connecting to neurological disorders. The study states that children whose mothers were exposed to high amounts of glyphosate experienced altered and dysfunctional gut microbiota. The specific imbalance of flora and fauna in the gut reflected as cognitive deficit and repetitive stereotyped behaviors (this is their definition of ASD symptoms).

I researched the counterargument as well, and the source [3] "The Genetic Literacy Project" claiming to debunk this research continuously put down studies as "bogus" rather than playing the part of a respectable academic source and giving their own evidence [4]. They gave no studies disproving the findings correlating glyphosate exposure to behavioral dysfunctions but rather claimed they were done by raving conspiracy theorists.

Though there isn't enough evidence to say glyphosate is causing autism at a high rate, many studies have been done linking the two to each other. It's an individuals choice to read the studies, and their references, or read a single article that claims to discredit them and frame them as uneducated while providing no evidence themselves other than their own trustworthiness.

[1]https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8316667/#:~:text=Exposure%20to%20the%20herbicide%20glyphosate,like%20behaviors%20in%20juvenile%20offspring.

[2]https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0147651323005833#bib69

[3]https://geneticliteracyproject.org/2025/01/31/autism-increase-mystery-solved-no-its-not-vaccines-gmos-glyphosate-or-organic-foods/

[4]https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0269749119368265?via%3Dihub

[5]https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9692419/#:~:text=Dysbiosis%20can%20result%20in%20neuroinflammation,(ALS)%20%5B163%5D.

True
0 like 0 dislike
ago by (190 points)
The claim made that glyphosate is linked to rising autism rates has some credibility to it, but is far exaggerated and needs to be reworded in order for it to be accurate. The link provided used as evidence takes you to a podcast by Zach Bush where he talks about the rise in autism rates having similar timing to the rise in glyphosate usage. Although he makes certain claims that have a certain level of visible correlation, nothing he says is backed up by a credible study or source, he is mainly relying off of his own knowledge. When it comes to the claim made, it could be considered true if it was made more specific, but the general nature of the comment has the potential for it be misleading.  https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32398374/, shown in this article here, it talks about how maternal ingestion of a glyphosate can cause autism like symptoms in the child once they are born, but there can't be a clear connection drawn between glyphosate and autism. It also talks about how genetics is a big factor when it comes to autism.  This claim also failed to mention that the correlation is indirect as it is the mother whom ingests the glyphosate, leaving many readers with the possibility of misinterpreting the claim as children consuming glyphosate can cause them to develop autism, which is completely false.
Exaggerated/ Misleading

Community Rules


• Be respectful
• Always list your sources and include links so readers can check them for themselves.
• Use primary sources when you can, and only go to credible secondary sources if necessary.
• Try to rely on more than one source, especially for big claims.
• Point out if sources you quote have interests that could affect how accurate their evidence is.
• Watch for bias in sources and let readers know if you find anything that might influence their perspective.
• Show all the important evidence, whether it supports or goes against the claim.
...