0 like 0 dislike
by Legend (7.9k points)
closed ago by
Harvard's Alejandra Caraballo spreads false info about gender medicine and journalists, and criticizing this topic can lead to harassment.
closed

2 Answers

0 like 0 dislike
ago by Novice (600 points)
selected ago by
 
Best answer

In Alejandra Caraballo's testimony, written in this paper, https://docs.house.gov/meetings/GO/GO02/20221213/115236/HHRG-117-GO02-Wstate-CaraballoA-20221213.pdf, addresses the rise of anti-transgender hate and its connection to online platforms, mainly focused on how this hate contributes to overall violence. While her testimony doesn't specifically target journalists, it does discuss how harmful narratives, intensified by various sources, including some media outlets, contribute to this aggressive environment. Her concern is the broader issue of discriminatory language and its impact, with gender-affirming care discussed within the context of wider attacks on the transgender community. This includes legislative efforts to restrict access to gender-affirming care, the mischaracterization of such care in public discussion, and the targeting of healthcare providers who offer this care. Ultimately, Caraballo's testimony highlights the urgent need to address the spread of harmful language and its potential to bring violence and discrimination.

Can't be true or false (Opinion, poem, etc.)
1 like 0 dislike
by (160 points)

I’m curious why you used that Bluesky post as a main source. Did you look into who "edawesome" is or whether they have any credentials in gender medicine, journalism, or fact-checking? The post reads more like personal commentary without citations or evidence. I think for a fact-check, it’s important to go beyond what someone says online and trace it back to actual data or studies. Like, if they're claiming Caraballo spreads misinformation, where’s the proof of that? Are they pointing to a specific quote and showing it’s false? Otherwise, it risks just repeating internet drama instead of verifying the facts. I would look into other sources such as, “Why Detransitioners Are Frustrated by the Media,” Jesse Singal, Substack, 2023 and“Transgender Advocates Face Online Harassment,” Washington Post, 2022 which dive deeper into the subject. Expanding your knowledge on the topic will allow you to look at it more critically and branch our form opinion driven statements. 

Can't be true or false (Opinion, poem, etc.)
by Newbie (360 points)
0 0
This is a very good response to the statement because you told them how they should've looked into a primary source rather than just go based of someone Bluesy. You provided a more reliable source, and commented on expanding your knowledge in order to be able to look at this argument more critically.
by Newbie (200 points)
0 0
I found that your response to this person was very insightful and well thought out. I believe this because you were affectively able to point out a source they used that is unreliable and you also provided context for them for what a reliable source should look like the next time they try to use a resource to back their claim. I also appreciate this response as you were able to make a counterargument with a reliable backing.
ago by Innovator (56.4k points)
0 0
Please add the source links when you cite publication or media outlets (re: Washington Post & Substack). Thanks!

Community Rules


• Be respectful
• Always list your sources and include links so readers can check them for themselves.
• Use primary sources when you can, and only go to credible secondary sources if necessary.
• Try to rely on more than one source, especially for big claims.
• Point out if sources you quote have interests that could affect how accurate their evidence is.
• Watch for bias in sources and let readers know if you find anything that might influence their perspective.
• Show all the important evidence, whether it supports or goes against the claim.
...