0 like 5 dislike
by Apprentice (1.8k points)
They made it in a lab.

They are making new pandemics in labs.

The former head of CDC has sounded an alarm about it.

Sheep population still too stupid and brainwashed to say one fucking word in defense of their own lives.

politicalfilm.wordpress.com/2024/07/13/c...

7 Answers

0 like 0 dislike
ago by Novice (600 points)
selected ago by
 
Best answer
The listed source is an incredibly opinionated blog site that uses completely unprofessional language that refers to opposing opinion groups as "sheep". An NBC article claims that COVID was originally thought to have come from a lab outbreak however the article states "The spokesperson added that the agency has “low confidence in this judgment” and will continue to evaluate any new intelligence reporting or relevant information."

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/politics-news/cia-shifts-assessment-covid-origins-saying-lab-leak-likely-caused-outb-rcna189284
Exaggerated/ Misleading
1 like 0 dislike
by Newbie (320 points)
reshown by
The only source given isn't a reliable source. It's a biased blog page mainly used for personal opinions on political conspiracy theories. The claim itself is also a personal post made by an account that is mainly about political film blogs. The post uses foul language and is targeting the audience for, "being sheep and not being able to defend their own lives." The post is very opinionated. Upon further investigation I did come across a video where according to the clip the ex-CDC director states that "it is my opinion that it came from a Chinese lab."  All though the claim is true for the post. The statement is backed up by an informed opinion by the former CDC director with little to no evidence on the matter.

https://www.cnn.com/videos/health/2021/03/26/sanjay-gupta-exclusive-robert-redfield-coronavirus-opinion-origin-sot-intv-newday-vpx.cnn
Satire
by Newbie (220 points)
0 0
I enjoyed how you were able to realize how satire it was due to the accounts past with other articles not related to the statement but still says a lot. as well as a post being disingenuous though the way they speak with such foul language.
0 like 0 dislike
ago by Newbie (310 points)

This claim that pandemics are being made in a lab, was made on an opinion blog, which leads me to believe that it has very low reliability in being a factually sound argument. Investigating further into the types of content that the blog contains, it seems to have a primary focus on other claims supporting a demographic of conspiracy culture, confirmation bias, and fear-mongering. On the margins of the blog page, there are two main quick search categories, "Covid" and "Nazis", along with several independent films one of which is named "When the Terrorists are Supernatural". Additionally, when digging deeper into this claim on other sites, there was a debate about the validity of the claim within articles such as the NBC article; "CIA shifts assessment on Covid origins, saying lab leak likely caused outbreak", although concluding in the article that there was a very "low level of confidence" within the agency's claim. Therefore this leads me to think that it was mainly built on speculation. 

politicalfilm.wordpress.com

https://politicalfilm.wordpress.com/2024/07/13/cdc-chief-redfields-testimony/

NBC news article

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/politics-news/cia-shifts-assessment-covid-origins-saying-lab-leak-likely-caused-outb-rcna189284

No available information
0 like 0 dislike
ago by Newbie (310 points)

First, the website that is cited is unreliable. The facts to back their claim up are cited as "social media scumbags". No one made COVID-19 in a lab, and nowhere in any source listed does it suggest that. The former head of the CDC also did not sound any alarm about it. The part you are criticizing is where he says, "They don't prevent infection, they do have side effects." This is not new information and most vaccines do not prevent infection they support the body in fighting the infection to limit the damage it can do. This is not sounding any alarm and is simply stating a fact about the vaccine, which is fairly well known.

To discuss your main claim, I found it difficult to find a definitive answer as the topic is highly riddled with misinformation. Some suggest that COVID-19 could have spread due to a lab leak, but to say it was made in a lab with the intention to cause destruction is exaggerated heavily. There are no reliable sources that contain evidence on this claim. Cited is an article explaining where pandemics come from, and one item listed is animal exposure, which is the original claim in the outbreak of COVID-19.

https://www.pfizer.com/news/articles/where_do_pandemics_come_from

Overall, the likelihood of COVID-19 being started in a lab is extremely low, and the rest of the claim is misleading and false.

Exaggerated/ Misleading
0 like 0 dislike
ago by Newbie (300 points)
This post seems to be either a super right winged conspiracy theorist page or a satire "rage bait" page looking to get people mad. Their whole bluesky page is filled with posts that are all opinion based and not backed by any facts or sources where they got the information, this post is the acception. The source they linked on the post is not only unreliable, but also seems to be very opinion based too with everything the website covers being swayed to one side of political views. The claim is that "They made it in a lab" which we are left to infer that they are talking about COVID-19, and that we (the sheep population) are too "stupid" and "brainwashed" to defend our lives. This whole claim is just an opinion and the former head of the CDC who originally made this claim of COVID-19 coming from a lab even said the words "It is my opinion" before making that statement.
Exaggerated/ Misleading
0 like 0 dislike
ago by Newbie (300 points)

The actual testimony given that the blog post is a portion of a hearing on determining the origins of Covid-19. The blog itself isn't a credible source, and it only provides two quotes without context for them, or analysis, it also draws the wrong conclusion from Dr. Redfield discussion on one of his initial hypothesis about the origins of Covid-19 possibly being from a lab. "My hypothesis... was that this was most likely come from a lab, and we need to aggressively investigate both hypothesis" (Dr. Redfield 1:46:14 - 1:46:26). This quote is referring to the early investigation into the origins of Covid-19 and the confusion comes from Dr. Redfield's discussion of the virus possibly coming from the lab with the limited data and information they had, and in the interest of not ruling anything out.

The links below take you to a video of the hearing with statements from and questions for Dr. Redfield at 39:04, 1:05:50, 1:21:29, 1:44:24, 2:03:57, 2:20:42, 2:25:33, 2:29:38,  as well as a link to his opening statement, but written out.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aXXWRaM-sWQ

https://www.hsgac.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/Testimony-Redfield-2024-07-11.pdf

False
ago by Innovator (51.8k points)
0 0
Nice work uncovering where the claim stems from!
0 like 0 dislike
ago by Newbie (350 points)

The only source provided is an unreliable blog focused on personal opinions and political conspiracy theories. The claim itself comes from an account primarily dedicated to political film blogs, and the post is highly opinionated, using foul language and accusing its audience of being "sheep" incapable of defending themselves.

The broader claim that pandemics are being deliberately created in labs originates from an opinion-based blog, which raises serious doubts about its factual reliability. The blog predominantly promotes conspiracy narratives, confirmation bias, and fear-mongering. Notably, its main search categories include "Covid" and "Nazis," alongside independent films, one of which is titled When the Terrorists Are Supernatural.

Exaggerated/ Misleading

Community Rules


• Be respectful
• Always list your sources and include links so readers can check them for themselves.
• Use primary sources when you can, and only go to credible secondary sources if necessary.
• Try to rely on more than one source, especially for big claims.
• Point out if sources you quote have interests that could affect how accurate their evidence is.
• Watch for bias in sources and let readers know if you find anything that might influence their perspective.
• Show all the important evidence, whether it supports or goes against the claim.
...