1 like 1 dislike
by Apprentice (1.8k points)
edited by
During the Jan. 6 riots, federal agents acted as provocateurs, and the Capitol's security measures were intentionally compromised from within.
by Newbie (230 points)
1 0
I think that the claim that federal agents acted as provocateurs isn't an accurate or truthful claim. I was wondering why you used bsky posts instead of an article or source since those might have more trustworthy information? Since there aren't any specific articles I could find that say the same information, it might be better to find more accurate claims for the post.
by (170 points)
1 0
Thanks for sharing your thoughts. It’s really important to rely on credible, well-documented sources when discussing events like the Jan. 6 riots. Social media platforms like Bluesky can sometimes spread unverified claims, so cross-checking information with trusted sources is key. For example, the Justice Department inspector general's report has directly debunked the theory that federal agents acted as provocateurs. The evidence shows that their role was to try to stop the violence and protect the Capitol, not to incite it. If you’re interested, I’d be happy to share tips on spotting reliable information or point you toward sources that provide a clearer picture.
by (170 points)
1 0
Thanks for sharing your thoughts. When discussing events like the Jan. 6 riots, it’s important to rely on well-documented, credible sources. Social media platforms like Bluesky can sometimes circulate unverified claims, which makes cross-checking with trusted sources essential.

6 Answers

2 like 0 dislike
by Novice (610 points)
selected by
 
Best answer

The claim that during the Jan. 6 riots, federal agents acted as provocateurs, and the Capitol's security measures were intentionally compromised from within is false. The link that you provided is to a video clip from Bluesky, which is a social media app which is not a reliable source and has no proof of your claim to be true. When researching one of the few reliable sources I could find said thatThe report from the Justice Department inspector general’s office knocks down a fringe conspiracy theory advanced by some Republicans in Congress that the FBI played a role in instigating the events that day, when rioters determined to overturn Republican Donald Trump’s 2020 election loss to Democrat Joe Biden stormed the building in a violent clash with police.” There is no evidence that federal agents acted as provocateurs. The only thing that federal agents were doing was trying to stop the attackers.

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/no-undercover-fbi-agents-at-jan-6-riot-watchdog-finds-in-rebuke-to-conspiracy-theories

2 like 0 dislike
by Novice (740 points)

This claim is very inaccurate, with little, if any, accurate support.  When looking at the linked source, it is just a social media post that has always seemed to be false information and more opinionated than actual truthful facts.  The source used also doesn't have any information that directly supports the claim being made and is just a video of the riot with no federal agents in the frame.  The comments on the post also didn't provide any evidence or speak about the fact that federal agents could have been involved. Additionally when looking up the topic the only reliable websites that talked about the riot claim that federal agents were indeed there to help and not trying to sabotage the event.  Here is a link to a special agent who recounts the events of that day which gives more insight into what was occurring. https://www.justice.gov/d9/peterson_kurt_-_statement_of_facts_redacted_1_0.pdf

False
by Novice (570 points)
0 0
The source from the primary source is a tremendous lynchpin that helps your answer hold weight. From a more critical point of view, linking to the reliable articles that help prove your point (as well as in Chicago style, but that is me nitpicking) would do a grander role of giving your claim a tad more power in the face of the original false claim.
1 like 0 dislike
by Newbie (210 points)
I think that the claim the Jan. 6th insurrection was done from the inside is not very well supported. Trumps supporters have been known to follow everything he says without question, and Trump instructed his followers to "fight like hell" after claiming voter fraud. The FBI themselves also stated that this claim was false, calling it "Ludicrous.'' There is also footage shown of riot police as well as capitol police attempting to calm down rioters, not egg them on.

Source: https://www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va/2024/01/04/fbi-conspiracy-jan-6-attack-misinformation/
False
0 like 0 dislike
ago by Newbie (300 points)

The claim that during the January 6th riots, federal agents acted as provocateurs during the insurrection, as well as the claim that the Capitol's security was intentionally compromised from within is a false claim. The post attached to this claim is from a social media platform which is not the most trustworthy place to gain evidence to support a claim. Doing a quick google search resulted in finding a post from the Department of Justice, Office of the Inspector General. In the post they covered many of the main points that were made about the january 6th insurrection including the following "No Undercover FBI Employees at the Protests or at the Captiol on January 6th. We found no evidence in the materials we reviewed or the testimony we recieved showing or suggesting that the FBI had undercover employees in the various protest crowds, or at the Capitol, on January 6th." They practically outright stated that there was no FBI involvement in the January 6th insurrection, knocking the conspiracy out of the park and into obscurity. Post: https://oig.justice.gov/news/doj-oig-releases-report-fbis-handling-its-confidential-human-sources-and-intelligence#:~:text=No%20Undercover%20FBI%20Employees%20at,the%20Capitol%2C%20on%20January%206.

False
0 like 0 dislike
ago by Newbie (300 points)

This is not true at all. The video that was provided was simply a compilation of clips that were purposely edited to make the federal agents in question the instigators. The support provided has no concrete evidence to back up the claim. 

This CNN article states that "A Justice Department watchdog found that there were no undercover FBI employees at the US Capitol during the January 6, 2021 riot." The Department of Justice has denied this claim and proved that there was no insider work during the January 6th riot. 

https://www.cnn.com/2024/12/12/politics/justice-inspector-general-january-6-fbi-report/index.html

False
0 like 0 dislike
ago by Newbie (300 points)
This claim is false; both CNN and the BBC have sources citing that no federal agents acted illegally. The BBC reports that confidential sources were involved in the initial protest but were not charged with illegal trespassing. The BBC writes, "Confidential sources are different from full-time, trained undercover agents." Again, this reiterates that it was not federal agents involved with this riot.

Sources:

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cn850jj44mjo

https://www.cnn.com/2024/12/12/politics/justice-inspector-general-january-6-fbi-report/index.html
False

Community Rules


• Be respectful
• Always list your sources and include links so readers can check them for themselves.
• Use primary sources when you can, and only go to credible secondary sources if necessary.
• Try to rely on more than one source, especially for big claims.
• Point out if sources you quote have interests that could affect how accurate their evidence is.
• Watch for bias in sources and let readers know if you find anything that might influence their perspective.
• Show all the important evidence, whether it supports or goes against the claim.
...