2 Answers

1 like 0 dislike
by Master (4.9k points)
edited ago by

The assertion that the FDA intentionally withheld known COVID‑19 vaccine risks is contradicted by a clear record of timely, publicly accessible warnings (including EUA fact‑sheet updates in June 2021 and expanded label requirements in 2025). FDA’s Emergency Use Authorizations (EUAs) for both the Pfizer–BioNTech and Moderna mRNA vaccines include explicit “Warnings and Precautions” sections describing myocarditis and pericarditis risks.

Though there is some risk of post-vaccine myocarditis (roughly 25-300 cases per million, depending on risk group), it should be noted that this rate is far lower than the risk of getting myocarditis through the SARS-CoV-2 virus itself (roughly 1,500 cases per million), according to research published by the NIH. Causal attribution requires case‑level investigations (e.g., autopsy reports, medical examiner findings) showing that a failure to disclose a risk led directly to a death. With a lack of those to go off of, the second part of this claim is unverifiable.

Exaggerated/ Misleading
by Newbie (490 points)
1 0
It should also be pointed out that the original article implies that warning labels on the vaccines did not "disclose the very real risks of heart damage that [the vaccines] cause, particularly among adolescent boys and young men."
However, the warning label for Pfizer's vaccine (Comirnaty) specifies that the risk of myocarditis and pericarditis is highest in males 12 through 17 years of age, while the label on Moderna's vaccine (Spikevax) states that males between the ages of 18 and 24 face the highest risk.
The new FDA instructions require warnings on both vaccines to state that the risk is highest for males aged 16 to 25. Therefore, the risk to adolescent males was already stated on the warning labels, with the "expanded" warnings partly serving to bring uniformity in the age range based on recent studies.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/fda-covid-vaccine-mrna-heart-side-effects-warning-label/
https://www.cnn.com/2025/05/21/health/fda-covid-vaccine-warning-heart-inflammation
ago by Master (4.9k points)
0 0
This is some great additional context that helps illustrate efforts by vaccine manufacturers and regulators to not only clearly state potential risks, but also to keep that info up to date as new research emerges.
0 like 0 dislike
ago by Hero (17.2k points)

This claim is exaggerated. The FDA followed strict safety protocols and publicly released data from clinical trials, including known risks and side effects. Like all medications, vaccines carry some risks, but the benefits of COVID vaccines in preventing severe illness and death far outweigh the rare adverse effects. While some people experienced side effects, there is no evidence that the FDA deliberately withheld life-saving information or caused deaths by its actions. Stevan Whitt, MD, an infectious disease doctor and chief medical officer at MU Health Care, said "This intentional misrepresentation is a powerful tactic to sow confusion among large groups of people."

Exaggerated/ Misleading

Community Rules


• Be respectful
• Always list your sources and include links so readers can check them for themselves.
• Use primary sources when you can, and only go to credible secondary sources if necessary.
• Try to rely on more than one source, especially for big claims.
• Point out if sources you quote have interests that could affect how accurate their evidence is.
• Watch for bias in sources and let readers know if you find anything that might influence their perspective.
• Show all the important evidence, whether it supports or goes against the claim.
...