Supporting Evidence: An article from the Markkula Center for Applied Ethics at Santa Clara University discusses several ethical concerns within the fitness industry:
Commodification of Fitness: The industry, valued at approximately $30 billion, often markets health as a purchasable product, emphasizing expensive classes, supplements, and recovery services. This approach can create the illusion that effective health and wellness require significant financial investment, potentially deterring individuals from pursuing affordable, sustainable fitness options.Santa Clara University
Misinformation and Lack of Regulation: A significant portion of fitness-related content on social media is produced by individuals lacking proper credentials, leading to the spread of unverified and potentially harmful information. The absence of universal standards for training or certification exacerbates this issue, making it challenging for consumers to distinguish reliable advice from fitness hearsay.Santa Clara University
Promotion of Unrealistic Body Standards: Social media platforms often showcase idealized images of fitness, neglecting the realities of individual health journeys. This portrayal can lead to body dissatisfaction, increased dieting, and the risk of developing eating disorders. The emphasis on achieving a specific aesthetic can overshadow the importance of overall health and well-being.Santa Clara University
For a more in-depth analysis, you can read the full article here: Realities of the Fitness Industry: Ethical Dilemmas and their Impacts on Health.Santa Clara University
The New Yorker+2Santa Clara University+2Exercise.com+2
Sources
