Factcheck this

Deep state DOJ is hiding key Seth Rich documents, exposing the heart of the Russia collusion hoax.

0 like 1 dislike
ago by Champion (13.1k points)
edited ago by
Deep state DOJ is hiding key Seth Rich documents, exposing the heart of the Russia collusion hoax.

---

Gateway Pundit: Deep State DOJ Hiding Seth Rich Documents – “The Heart of the Russia Collusion Hoax”
https://bsky.app/profile/ianhansen.bsky.social/post/3luevy6v3yk2k

2 Answers

0 like 0 dislike
ago by Prodigy (9.5k points)

Attorney Ty Clevenger has indeed been filing FOIA requests related to Seth Rich since at least 2018 and has publicly criticized the FBI's document release schedule, which he estimates would take decades to complete. However, whether this constitutes purposeful 'hiding' or 'illegal delay,' as alleged in the linked Joe Hoft article, is a legal determination that courts have not definitively established.

Currently, no credible evidence supports the conspiracy theory that DNC staffer Seth Rich was murdered because he leaked sensitive emails to WikiLeaks. Multiple authoritative sources, including a Senate Select Committee report and a PolitiFact analysis, have debunked this claim. In fact, Fox News settled a lawsuit with Rich's parents for exploiting their son's death through inflammatory headlines and commentary.

False
0 like 0 dislike
ago by Titan (24.7k points)

This claim is false. There is no evidence that Seth Rich was involved in leaking DNC emails. U.S. intelligence agencies and the bipartisan Senate Intelligence Committee concluded that Russian operatives were responsible for the 2016 DNC hack. The theory linking Rich to WikiLeaks was debunked and traced back to a Russian disinformation campaign. The DOJ has released documents related to the case under FOIA, and no credible evidence supports claims of a cover-up or connection to the Russia investigation.

False

Categories

Community Rules

• Be respectful
• Always list your sources and include links so readers can check them for themselves.
• Use primary sources when you can, and only go to credible secondary sources if necessary.
• Try to rely on more than one source, especially for big claims.
• Point out if sources you quote have interests that could affect how accurate their evidence is.
• Watch for bias in sources and let readers know if you find anything that might influence their perspective.
• Show all the important evidence, whether it supports or goes against the claim.
Snow Theme by Q2A Market
Powered by Question2Answer
...