0 like 0 dislike
by Hero (15.5k points)
edited by
There was no pandemic.

1 Answer

0 like 0 dislike
ago by Titan (20.6k points)
selected ago by
 
Best answer

This comes from former University of Ottawa physics professor Denis Rancourt, who argues there was no actual pandemic caused by a virulent pathogen. Instead, he claims excess mortality during the COVID period resulted from government responses and medical interventions rather than the virus itself.

Multiple fact-checking organizations have identified significant flaws in Rancourt's methodology and conclusions. Science Feedback's analysis reveals a critical issue with his approach: Rancourt's team correlated spikes in excess mortality during the post-vaccination period with vaccine rollout timing. This correlation-based argument fails on two fronts. First, correlation alone cannot establish causation. Second, and more importantly, these mortality spikes corresponded directly to surges in COVID-19 deaths, making the virus—not vaccines—the most likely cause.

Factcheck.org reached similar conclusions, noting that "Rancourt's conclusions are flawed because they rely on assumptions that spikes in deaths were caused by COVID-19 vaccines without showing evidence of this—and when COVID-19 itself is a clear contributor to excess deaths."

Peer-reviewed studies consistently contradict Rancourt's claims. Science Feedback notes that "published studies haven't found that vaccinated people are more likely to experience higher all-cause mortality compared to unvaccinated people." Research published in Frontiers in Medicine demonstrates that vaccination mortality rates were significantly lower than the 2019 monthly all-cause mortality rate of 0.3% for adults 65 and older and the 30-day all-cause mortality rate of 21.5% among U.S. nursing home residents with COVID-19. The study concludes that "the benefits of COVID-19 vaccines outweigh the potential risks in older frail populations."

False

Community Rules


• Be respectful
• Always list your sources and include links so readers can check them for themselves.
• Use primary sources when you can, and only go to credible secondary sources if necessary.
• Try to rely on more than one source, especially for big claims.
• Point out if sources you quote have interests that could affect how accurate their evidence is.
• Watch for bias in sources and let readers know if you find anything that might influence their perspective.
• Show all the important evidence, whether it supports or goes against the claim.
...