This claim is completely false. Adolescent pregnancies are not common, but they do occur.
Tracking the original source of this claim, it is clear that there is no factual evidence. This claim was not even drawn from an article with a headline or created by a well-respected author. It was stated on a social platform called 'Bluesky,' where anyone can say anything, regardless of its validity. There is very little filtering on this platform to give people the freedom to express themselves. However, this may be harmful to people in use of the platform, as they encounter misinformation. People may begin to ignore or deny the dangers of child pregnancy and sexual assault. It is necessary that people are aware of the inaccuracy of this claim. The author of this post has no notoriety, whatsoever. The structure of this post lacks punctuation and professionalism. There is no expansion or source for this claim on the social media platform. This post was created September 13, 2025, in response to a thread discussing abortion rights. The original topic of discussion began with a quote tweet of a post regarding the character of the recently passed Charlie Kirk. The post provides opinions on the beliefs held by the political influencer. This ignited a conversation about controversial things that Charlie Kirk had vocalized in the past. One of these statements summed up Kirk’s beliefs about abortion, regardless of age. In reply, someone alleged that Kirk claimed that a pregnant 10-year-old should still be required to birth their child, as abortion is morally wrong. In reply, @blasted.off.bsky.social states “Would you force a ten year old girl to go through a pregnancy and deliver a baby, because Charlie would have. Nothing of value was lost. One less nazi hate monger.” Following, the original claim comes in by @maximusdeicmus.bsky.social : “10 year olds can’t have babies.” When following the user to their profile, there are plenty of posts about political views, making it very clear that this person is heavily right-winged. That indicates bias within the claim. Many other media outlets disagree with this declaration. These include the renowned ‘New York Times’ and ‘World Health Organization.’ The New York Times is a highly reliable source, widely recognized for their established ethical standards and transparency. The company was awarded four Pulitzer Prizes in the year of 2025. In an article published July 14th, 2022, headlined ‘Doctor Informed State of 10-Year-Old Girl’s Abortion,’ the authors are informative about an occurrence where a 10-year-old rape victim had to travel to another state in order to receive an abortion. This information alone indicates the inaccuracy of the original claim. This fact that the child received an abortion undoubtedly confirms that she, a 10-year-old, was undoubtedly pregnant. The article affirms, “The document, a ‘Terminated Pregnancy Report’ filed with the Indiana Department of Health and the Department of Child Services, states that Dr. Bernard provided abortion medication — a two-pill combination that can be taken at home or in any location and is authorized for use in the first 10 weeks of pregnancy — to a 10-year-old patient on June 30. The report was dated July 2, which puts it within Indiana’s three-day reporting requirement. (Stolberg and Sasani). The New York Times received their information from a government source, clarifying the situation surrounding the conflict of this child’s abortion. This primary source confirms that this girl was 100% pregnant at age 10. The New York Times gathered this information from national health policy, interviews, documents, and laws. Moreover, the World Health Organization is globally considered as a highly credible source due to its extensive use of technical expertise and scholarly analysis of international issues. The World Health Organization has been established as an impressive organization, spreading scientific and technical information to the world. In a report titled ‘Adolescent Pregnancy’ published April 10, 2024, the organization describes the dangers and consequences of adolescents having children. The article enlightens, “Adolescent mothers (aged 10–19 years) face higher risks of eclampsia, puerperal endometritis and systemic infections than women aged 20–24 years, and babies of adolescent mothers face higher risks of low birth weight, preterm birth and severe neonatal condition,” (WHO). This demonstrates that girls at the age of 10 can be pregnant, including internationally, and there are detrimental effects. This claim ignores the struggles and traumas of these younger girls who have plenty of damage to their bodies. If people are seeing that “10-year-olds can't get pregnant,” they might begin to believe it and create a lack of awareness on the situation of adolescent pregnancy. The World Health Organization cultivated this information from various journals and surveys from the United Nations, the Ministry of Health Zambia, and the Philippine Statistics Authority. All in all, this claim is untrue and sourced from an unprincipled social media site. It can be discredited by many dependable and honorable sources. 10-year-olds can get pregnant.
