Hello there! We are currently on summer break and only doing a bit of fact-checking. We’ll be back in full swing in early October.
0 like 1 dislike
ago by Hero (17.8k points)
edited ago by
* January 6 was highly charged with astrological energy, including a star connected to chaos and destruction and an astral placement on January 6 that triggered a the energy of a previous eclipse.
If you’re gonna be honest, you have to take a holistic view, which is looking at all angles. You don’t.

1 Answer

0 like 0 dislike
ago by Titan (27.3k points)
selected ago by

As far as we know, astrology is not scientifically testable. What counts as “highly charged with astrological energy” is a matter of belief, not empirical evidence. On the differences between astrology and astronomy, NASA says "astrology is based on the belief that the location of certain stars and planets in the sky can predict the future or describe what a person is like. While astrology is important to some cultural traditions, its claims are not based on scientific evidence." 

While there was an eclipse in late 2020, there isn't any evidence that the January 6 planetary positions “triggered” former eclipse energy like some astrologers may claim. 

Can't be true or false (Opinion, poem, etc.)

Community Rules


• Be respectful
• Always list your sources and include links so readers can check them for themselves.
• Use primary sources when you can, and only go to credible secondary sources if necessary.
• Try to rely on more than one source, especially for big claims.
• Point out if sources you quote have interests that could affect how accurate their evidence is.
• Watch for bias in sources and let readers know if you find anything that might influence their perspective.
• Show all the important evidence, whether it supports or goes against the claim.
...