2 Answers

0 like 0 dislike
ago by (140 points)

On Wednesday, October 1st, Kash Patel, Director of the FBI, stated that the FBI would be cutting ties with the Anti-Defamation League(ADL), a prominent Jewish advocacy organization that fights antisemitism. In his tweet he wrote how James Comey embedded FBI agents within the group to spy on Americans, he then goes on to state how that era is over and how “the FBI won’t partner with political fronts masquerading as watchdogs.”


From FBI Director Kash Patel’s “X” tweet we learn why the FBI is cutting ties from the ADL.

https://x.com/fbidirectorkash/status/1973471038911697022?s=42

True
0 like 0 dislike
ago by (140 points)

The source that you provided, MSN, likely took this finding from another news source or news outlet. First I believe it is important to find the original source and link to the original findings. The first of the credible sources that I found was Reuters (Reuters), reporting that the FBI under Patel has formally ended its partnership with the ADL, quoting him directly: “We won’t partner with political fronts masquerading as watchdogs.” In addition, I found Newsweek (Newsweek) saying, "Patel said that past collaborations between the FBI and ADL under Comey blurred the lines between law enforcement and advocacy organizations. He alleged on X that Comey “wrote ‘love letters’ to the ADL and embedded FBI agents with them."

Although each source may have minor biases, I believe that overall each source is pointing to the same answer that, yes Petel did cut off the ADL, but it is because of its relationship withe previous FBI director.


In his public declaration that he would not collaborate with the ADL, Kash Patel brought up James Comey's previous association with the group. Although it oversimplifies the decision's larger logic, the claim accurately captures Patel's remarks.
 

True

Community Rules


• Be respectful
• Always list your sources and include links so readers can check them for themselves.
• Use primary sources when you can, and only go to credible secondary sources if necessary.
• Try to rely on more than one source, especially for big claims.
• Point out if sources you quote have interests that could affect how accurate their evidence is.
• Watch for bias in sources and let readers know if you find anything that might influence their perspective.
• Show all the important evidence, whether it supports or goes against the claim.
...