This claim is technically false. Although many initial reports about the Louvre heist allege that it took 7-8 minutes, according to the most recent reporting, it is believed to have taken only 4.
Multiple highly trusted and reputable news sources such as ABC News and the New York Times have reported that the Louvre heist took just under 8 minutes.
https://abcnews.go.com/International/thieves-robbed-louvre-minutes-minute-minute-breakdown-daring/story?id=126719610
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/10/19/world/europe/louvre-paris-robbery.html
Therefore, upon first glance, one would assume that was the correct duration of the heist. However, all of those articles are from 3-4 days ago. That may seem recent in the grand scheme of things, but given how fast things can change during an ongoing investigation of this profile, this is old, outdated, and inaccurate news.
Yesterday Time Magazine published the latest update on the case, now claiming that the heist took only 4 minutes. The piece titled Louvre Heist: How Thieves Carried Out an Audacious Heist of Napoleonic Jewels reads: "Investigators say the thieves entered and exited the museum in under four minutes on Sunday morning, escaping with eight pieces from France’s Crown Jewels." A 3-minute difference may seem minute, but the heist taking just 4 minutes is even more mind-boggling and impressive, not to mention that that small detail could be crucial to investigators.
https://time.com/7326868/louvre-robbery-museum-crown-jewels/
Overall this claim is untrue, but not in a malicious or misinformative way; the original reporting is just outdated. Perhaps in 3 days we'll find out it really took 2 minutes and what we trust now may also be false.