0 like 0 dislike
ago in General Factchecking by Newbie (260 points)
Rutgers fraternity permanently closed after student critically injured in an alleged electrical hazing incident on Oct. 15. Alpha Sigma Phi chapter shut down following investigation. The house itself as a structure had previously been deemed unsafe for living and had quite a few building code violations. This was the implication made by the "laundry list of known red flags." However the chapter house did get shut down and the student injured was in critical condition. They are still waiting to know the full details of who and what was involved. The electricity claims are not confirmed, the only thing states was that water was involved, not to sure what that means. Claim was slightly misleading.

1 Answer

0 like 0 dislike
ago by (190 points)


 

 The claim stated above is true, but slightly exaggerated. Based on the source provided above it seems that the company that Ted Sherman works for is unreliable. User perception and other analyses suggest a decline in quality that shifts towards clickbait and less accurate reporting. The news channel Fox 12 where the source “Frat house where students were electrocuted in alleged hazing had laundry list of known red flags report” came from is also known to have failed fact checks that are either false or misleading. Which tells us that both of the sources that are making these claims aren’t trustworthy, the information that they provide may be true but not the full truth. To add on the fox news source states that a 19 year old was injured in an incident that involved water and electricity at a fraternity. I compared many reliable sources to Fox 12,  ABC news being one. And they all had one thing in common, they all stated the exact same thing about the incident and the 19 year olds condition. Which tells us this incident did in fact occur in New Jersey and that he is hospitalized but not in critical condition anymore based on multiple reports on this incident and statements made by a spokesperson for the prosecutor's office. I found primary sources like official statements from Rutgers University and the Middlesex county prosecutor's office that confirm that a student was found unresponsive after a 911 call, these statements verify the incident. Both Fox 12 and NJ news both made statements that didn’t have any information to back it up, one being “ a second student was reportedly shocked as well after attempting to pull the kid away from the wire”. After doing some research there was nothing that led to a second person being electrocuted which tells us that Ted Sherman is exaggerating the story. ABC news on the other hand provides verified information on the topic and didn’t mention a second individual being harmed. The secondary sources I used were Fox news, ABC, and NJ. ABC was verified by law enforcement while NJ and Fox made claims that were unverified. Fox 12 news is attempting to make claims about what really happened that night and isn’t providing where they got the information from, therefore we cannot believe it is true since the 19 year old individual and everyone involved has yet to be identified or come out about the situation. This tells us that this incident did occur but we don’t know the full facts of the story until we have direct information from the main source which is everyone involved and the 19 year old. 

https://www.foxnews.com/us/frat-house-where-student-electrocuted-alleged-hazing-had-laundry-list-known-red-flags-report 

https://www.nj.com/news/2025/10/hazing-involved-when-rutgers-student-was-critically-injured-at-frat-house-national-org-says.html

Exaggerated/ Misleading

Community Rules


• Be respectful
• Always list your sources and include links so readers can check them for themselves.
• Use primary sources when you can, and only go to credible secondary sources if necessary.
• Try to rely on more than one source, especially for big claims.
• Point out if sources you quote have interests that could affect how accurate their evidence is.
• Watch for bias in sources and let readers know if you find anything that might influence their perspective.
• Show all the important evidence, whether it supports or goes against the claim.
...