0 like 0 dislike
ago in General Factchecking by Newbie (450 points)

3 Answers

0 like 0 dislike
ago by Newbie (340 points)
You didn't provide any source, but as someone on the autism spectrum I can confirm this is false. Not only because of the fact that the social interactions I have had it has seemed like the opposite is true, I can't seem to read people well, but also because of the fact that telepathy is pure science fiction. Under no circumstances has there been any proof of telepathy in human beings, full stop.
False
ago by Innovator (64.1k points)
0 0
Please provide source links for your fact-checks. Thanks!
0 like 0 dislike
ago by Novice (680 points)

The claim that "people with autism can communicate telepathically" is mostly false, but it is difficult to prove is completely true or false because of the unreliability of the data.  . After a brief google search, it seems that the origin of this claim is from a video with Dr. Diane Powell, a John's Hopkins trained psychiatrist who states that children with autism could have telepathic powers or a form of Extrasensory Perception, better known as ESP (Oregon Public Broadcasting, 2025). Her claim is based on an experiment ran with participant Haley, a child on the autism spectrum. Haleys mother held a card to the camera, then had Haley write the word on the card without seeing it. She gets it correct. To Powell, this is basis for telepathic ability. The podcast, titled "The Telepathy Tapes" topped charts on Spotify and sparked much debate surrounding the topic. 

Before I bring in a secondary source, it is important to note the political bias and leaning of the first source, Oregon Public Broadcasting. According to Allsides, OPB has a center bias, meaning that it does not particularly lean in either direction. When discussing a topic like autism, this means that it will not lean in either direction, right or left. Autism is a polarized topic in the current political climate, especially given RFK Jr's recent claims about Tylenol contributing to increased likelihood or a child developing autism. 

A second source is Vice in 2025, also analyzing the same podcast, where they state that there are no reliable, replicable findings to support this claim. Despite Powell's insistence and situational findings, there is no hard evidence to either prove or disprove this claim. Vice, according to Allsides, has a political bias rating of farther left, meaning that is more likely to represent perspectives that paint the democrat or left leaning politics in a favorable light and discredit the right and republican perspectives. When analyzing media that is polarized, it is important to look at sources with differing perspectives. By cross analyzing, we can eliminate some of our own potential biases. 

False
0 like 0 dislike
ago by Newbie (240 points)
The claim that people with autism can communicate telepathically is not supported by credible scientific evidence. While some unreliable stories and podcasts have popularized this idea, they often rely on facilitated communication (FC), a method where a helper guides a nonverbal person to type or point, a technique that has been widely discredited by experts for producing misleading results. Psychiatrist Diane Powell's informal research is frequently cited in support of the claim, but her studies have not been proven to be true. Sources like The Skeptic and Psychology Today emphasize that there is no verified evidence of telepathy among autistic individuals. Promoting this narrative risks spreading misinformation and detracts from meaningful, evidence-based approaches that genuinely support communication for nonverbal autistic people.

https://www.skeptic.org.uk/2025/01/the-telepathy-tapes-is-wrong-autistic-children-dont-have-supernatural-powers/

https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/beyond-the-ordinary/202510/nonspeaking-autism-the-telepathy-tapes-and-who-gets-to-be-heard
False

Community Rules


• Be respectful
• Always list your sources and include links so readers can check them for themselves.
• Use primary sources when you can, and only go to credible secondary sources if necessary.
• Try to rely on more than one source, especially for big claims.
• Point out if sources you quote have interests that could affect how accurate their evidence is.
• Watch for bias in sources and let readers know if you find anything that might influence their perspective.
• Show all the important evidence, whether it supports or goes against the claim.
...