1. Write a brief overall summary of your findings.
https://www.today.com/health/recall/listeria-outbreak-pasta-recall-2025-rcna241797
This article begins with the numeral information that 6 people have died and 25 have been hospitalized due to prepared meals containing Listeria. They then go into a list of the recalled products and the locations Listeria has been found in, as well as actually explaining what Listeria is and how to take action if one has purchased the contaminated products.
https://www.npr.org/2025/11/04/nx-s1-5598279/listeria-outbreak-prepared-pasta
This article also covers the same topic, saying that 6 people were killed but they pull information and cite directly from the CDC.They also include the list of states Listeria has been reported in, and they dive into the company, Nates Fine Foods, including the names of the recalled products. Similar to the first article, they also have a section dedicated to gaining knowledge and figuring out what to do about Listeria itself.
2. What primary sources did you find (e.g., transcripts, videos of politician speeches, tweets from public figures, scientific studies)? For each source, write at least one or two sentences explaining what you learned. Include all links.
While I found two secondary sources, the second article uses primary information from the CDC, in which their “What to know – and do – about Listeria” section provides many recommendations directly from the CDC. They also use quantitative data in combination with quotes from the FDA to back their claim. The first article also includes information from the FDA and CDC, but they include the information in a more summarized way, rather than using direct quotes. For example, they use vague language such as saying "according to”, instead of directly quoting the CDC or FDA.
3. What secondary sources did you find (e.g., newspapers, magazines)? Only use secondary sources if sufficient primary sources are not available. For each source, write at least one or two sentences explaining what you learned. Include all links.
I found two secondary sources. I have learned from both articles that the company Nates Fine Food has recalled pasta products that have caused serious cases of Listeria across 18 states. The first article, published by Today, supports the claim in an organized structure, while the second article, from NPR, backs their claim through the CDC and FDA.
4. What potential biases or interests might each of your sources have?
Because this headline is very recent, both sources could have an intrigued interest to overlook information just to get their own stories out, but because both sources reference the CDC and FDA, which are nationally recognized organizations, there is evidence to believe that their information is not biased.
5. What evidence supports the claim you are fact-checking?
I think that finding multiple sources supports the claim that I am fact checking. Both sources I found contain similar information, which have been pulled from the CDC and FDA, and they both back up the original claim in News Detective.
6. What evidence undermines the claim you are fact-checking?
7. What happened when you tried contacting the person or group who made the original claim? (Always try to contact them—it’s okay if you don’t get a reply. For example, if the claim is that the president said something, try reaching out to the administration. If it was a Bluesky user, message that user on Bluesky.)