0 like 0 dislike
ago in General Factchecking by (190 points)

Carlson had Fuentes, someone with a well-documented history of antisemitic, racist and extremist rhetoric, on his podcast. This sparked backlash, especially among conservative figures who said Carlson normalized hate-speech by hosting someone like Fuentes without sufficient push-back. Supporters of Carlson and some conservative institutions defended the interview or questioned whether censoring Fuentes was the solution. 

The fallout was messy: the Heritage Foundation (whose president publicly defended Carlson’s right to host Fuentes) faced internal revolt, calls for resignations, and serious damage to its reputation. On a broader level, this episode exposed a deep rift in the conservative movement: one side wants to push out extremism and reaffirm certain principles, the other is more comfortable with letting previously fringe figures into the fold if they align with a “populist” or “anti-establishment” standpoint.

Please log in or register to answer this question.

Community Rules


• Be respectful
• Always list your sources and include links so readers can check them for themselves.
• Use primary sources when you can, and only go to credible secondary sources if necessary.
• Try to rely on more than one source, especially for big claims.
• Point out if sources you quote have interests that could affect how accurate their evidence is.
• Watch for bias in sources and let readers know if you find anything that might influence their perspective.
• Show all the important evidence, whether it supports or goes against the claim.
...