0 like 0 dislike
in General Factchecking by Newbie (210 points)

Meta has recently shifted its social media approach toward free expression. This leads to fewer posts being taken down, even ones that previously could've violated rules about misinformation or harmful content. Instead of removing posts immediately, Meta is trying a different approach, such as changing who can view certain posts and using user feedback. This shows Meta’s Commitment to user input and a freer online space. 

This claim is valid because, according to Wired, Meta reported taking down 50% fewer posts that violated its rules across Facebook and Instagram. Meta’s moderators have been told to be less aggressive when assessing posts, and Meta publicly acknowledged a shift toward “speech over safety.” As a result, posts across Facebook and Instagram are being taken down at a significantly lower rate.

1 Answer

0 like 0 dislike
ago by Newbie (310 points)
edited ago by

According to Meta "We’re getting rid of a number of restrictions on topics like immigration, gender identity and gender that are the subject of frequent political discourse and debate. It’s not right that things can be said on TV or the floor of Congress, but not on our platforms." Later that year, Meta released an integrity report  And reported that their relaxing of policy they had reduced the amount of content they took action against.  "Across a range of policy areas we saw a decrease in the amount of content actioned and a decrease in the percent of content we took action on before a user reported it. With all this in mind, the claim that Meta is removing fewer posts because of changes in moderation to be more "relaxed" is valid. As evident in the more controversial and sometimes politically charged topics such as immigration, gender, etc being opened for further discussion. 

True

Community Rules


• Be respectful
• Always list your sources and include links so readers can check them for themselves.
• Use primary sources when you can, and only go to credible secondary sources if necessary.
• Try to rely on more than one source, especially for big claims.
• Point out if sources you quote have interests that could affect how accurate their evidence is.
• Watch for bias in sources and let readers know if you find anything that might influence their perspective.
• Show all the important evidence, whether it supports or goes against the claim.
...