In my research, I found that the first recorded case of Influenza A infection in humans happened during November of 2025, in Washington. It's still being investigated, but officials suspect it was from exposure to birds, either from their backyard domesticated birds, environment, or wild birds. However, I also found that it's not that easy for humans to get.
There were no primary sources that I could easily find.
Secondary Source 1:
https://kingcounty.gov/en/dept/dph/health-safety/disease-illness/health-advisories/2025/11-25-influenza-a-h5n5#:~:text=This%20is%20the%20first%20known,their%20environment%2C%20or%20wild%20birds.
According to the Washington-based King County government website, the first human case of Influenza A (aka H5N5) was confirmed in Washington, with the individual unfortunately passing away just 8 days after getting diagnosed. This website listed out several potential factors that could increase your likelihood of getting exposed, as well as general information about theories of exposure and the order of events.
Secondary Source 2:
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/first-human-dies-of-rare-h5n5-bird-flu-strain-heres-what-you-need-to-know/
According to Scientific American, the first recorded case of a human getting the H5N5 viral infection was the first death from bird flu in the U.S. since January. This article provided a ton of background context into what the bird flu pandemic situation has been up until this point, what this means for an average reader concerned, and why this might have affected this certain individual. As well, they also provide well-researched assurances that this new strain is not predicted to cause a world-ending pandemic, but that it is simply a variant from the H5N1 strain that has been popularly reported on.
Both of my sources are secondary, although I found many as equally reputable ones saying the same thing. This does not mean that they are free from bias, but both media sources are very transparent about their information. The first is a government-run website, and the second is a reputable news outlet that is very transparent about its processes and goals.
Overall, this claim seems to be true, based on the assertions from multiple sources. The only thing I would add is context, otherwise this claim could fearmonger a bit, spreading the fear that a new kind of bird flu is infecting humans left and right, when that's simply not the case.