1 like 0 dislike
in General Factchecking by Novice (580 points)
I saw this on Snapchat's news section a few days ago. I do not remember which media source was reporting on it.

2 Answers

1 like 0 dislike
by Novice (880 points)
selected by
 
Best answer

In this NPR article they stated: "robots will only be used as a deadly force option when risk of loss of life to members of the public or officers are imminent and outweigh any other force option available to the SFPD". https://www.npr.org/2022/11/28/1139523832/san-francisco-considers-allowing-law-enforcement-robots-to-use-lethal-force

by Innovator (51.8k points)
0 0
Nice job including a detailed explanation and strong source link. Don't forget to add a rating to the fact-check, such as "not misinformation, true" if your evidence proves that.
1 like 0 dislike
by Journeyman (2.3k points)

This was in fact a policy that San Francisco officials voted on. However, according to a CNN article titled, "Amid public outcry, San Francisco officials reverse course and reject police use of robots to kill," it was stated that "San Francisco officials voted Tuesday against a controversial measure that would have allowed police to deploy robots to use lethal force in extreme situations, reversing course after public outcry against the policy." 

Supervisor Hillary Ronen said "The public outcry helped six Supervisors fully appreciate the gravity of last week’s vote and the numerous unanswered questions about both the ethics and practical implications of allowing police to use machines to kill human beings."

Therefore, at one point this claim was true, but it is now false after the reversal of the policy. 

https://www.cnn.com/2022/12/07/us/san-francisco-rejects-police-controlled-robots/index.html#:~:text=San%20Francisco%20officials%20voted%20Tuesday,public%20outcry%20against%20the%20policy.

False

Community Rules


• Be respectful
• Always list your sources and include links so readers can check them for themselves.
• Use primary sources when you can, and only go to credible secondary sources if necessary.
• Try to rely on more than one source, especially for big claims.
• Point out if sources you quote have interests that could affect how accurate their evidence is.
• Watch for bias in sources and let readers know if you find anything that might influence their perspective.
• Show all the important evidence, whether it supports or goes against the claim.
...